.

Dearborn Superintendent's Compensation Ranks 48th in State

A new database compiled by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy shows Dearborn Public Schools' superintendent is earning $218,355 in salary and benefits.

The superintendent of Dearborn Public Schools may be well compensated—but not when compared to Michigan school districts of a similar size.

According to a new database compiled by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, and using 2012 salary and benefit information provided by school districts throughout the state, the total compensation for DPS Superintendent Brian Whiston is $218,355.

This includes a base salary of $170,000, plus a $36,678 annual pension contribution, $1,177 insurance and $10,500 annuity. He also receives 18 sick days and 28 vacation days per year.

Michigan superintendents earn an average salary of $115,000 and average compensation package of $155,000, according to the database.

"While compensation for superintendents only amounts to about 1 percent of public school spending, the public should have easy access to this particular information,” said Michael Van Beek, Mackinac's director of education policy, in a press release. “As CEOs of districts and often the highest paid government employee in a local community, superintendent pay deserves an extra level of public scrutiny."

But in Dearborn, the numbers also tell a different story: Whiston is the least compensated leader of a school district of Dearborn's size in the state of Michigan.

Dearborn is the fifth largest school district in the state in terms of enrollment—with more than 19,000 students as of its October count day. It trails behind Detroit, Utica, Plymouth-Canton and Grand Rapids.

But when looking at superintendent compensation, Dearborn clocks in at No. 48 on a list of 606 school districts, with 36 districts excluded from the report.

In Wayne County, Dearborn is fourth on the list—coming in nearly $20,000 below Grosse Pointe Public Schools, which has an enrollment of less than 9,000 students.

Of the state’s 10 districts with more than 15,000 students enrolled, Whiston’s compensation package comes in dead last.

The report shows that compensation for the superintendent of Plymouth-Canton Community Schools—with close to 19,000 students—comes in at $41,847 in benefits. However, the district does not currently have a full-time superintendent. Acting Superintendent Jeremy Hughes, who lives in Dearborn, also earns $700 per day, or up to about $182,000 for a full year, according to Plymouth-Canton Patch.

Detroit Public Schools were not included in the report.

See the full database at http://www.mackinac.org/depts/epi/salary.aspx.

Donna Hay February 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM
How does he rank when it comes to test scores??
Kamal Makki February 22, 2013 at 02:56 PM
And our schools lack money for our teachers and students
mrini February 22, 2013 at 03:08 PM
I would be interested in knowing how many associate superindents there are in the other districts among other high paying officals at central office.
Michael Matigian February 22, 2013 at 03:43 PM
It's Time the city and school district get their act together !! How much more can the tax payer's take. This is a city that has seen a decline in business look at Michigan Ave and all the empty store front's !! We need leader's that will do the right thing and not the political correct thing so the can keep their Jobs.
SandraB February 22, 2013 at 03:50 PM
Maybe he's not underpaid. Maybe the other 47 are just overpaid.
Dearborn Taxpayer February 22, 2013 at 10:32 PM
46 paid days off a year, > 9 weeks! And our teachers get told that they can not use their sick days because the disctrict is trying to save on substitute expenses. Maybe he can donate these back to the district and put a little more in the schools' substitute budget...
AbuHak February 22, 2013 at 11:41 PM
Dearborn has to rank near the top in the number of administrators and pseudo administrators in the entire state. How many districts have a Public Relations person because the Superintendent can't talk? There is an assistant administrator for the HR administrator because he has no experience with HR. No one really does their own job. In many schools, teachers are being taken out of the classroom and given administrative duties to "free-up' the administration who claim they have no time to deal with certain issues. So by no means is poor Whiston underpaid for the work everyone else is doing.
AbuHak February 22, 2013 at 11:44 PM
I'm sure when Whiston uses this data to ask for a salary increase, the school board will fall over each other to rubber stamp it.
Lee Jacobsen February 23, 2013 at 03:33 AM
Just doing some simple math, assuming Whiston works 52 weeks a year, 40 hours a week, at that salary, it works out to $105 per hour. A little more math shows he gets $38,640 for those 46 days of paid off time. Administrators work all year round, right? No summers off to harvest the crops etc. I suspect those summers off apply somewhat to the administrators as well, including fall break, Christmas break, Winter break, and spring break, another $40 grand of relaxing with no school meetings, no responsibilities. it is easy enough to verify this with the 2013 school schedule. http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=dearborn+school+calendar+2012&oq=Dearborn+school&gs_l=hp.1.3.0l4.0.0.1.3001.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.les%3B..0.0...1c..4.psy-ab.YtXGREMO-OA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.42768644,d.dmQ&fp=24f4f7b4fe2b29d3&biw=984&bih=407 Interesting that July is not on the schedule. Only a couple of days in Aug appear on the schedule. I am sure the administrators are busy those two months. If our administrator is underpaid at $105 per hour, what are others making? If you factor in the lack of July, most of August, and all the breaks, it works out to $132 per hour, and that is not counting vacation, and the paid 46 days off. if Dearborn kids were at the top of the educational heap, it would be worth it. They are not . I don't think tossing another $10 per hour will add any more incentive, not when he is already making over $1000 dollars a day.
J. Allen February 23, 2013 at 01:34 PM
I believe that it was Mark Twain that said, "In the first place, God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made school boards." It appears that those idoits have figured out how to acquire some very impressive wages for some very mediocre work at our expense. Shame on us for allowing this to happen.
Kamal Makki February 23, 2013 at 02:52 PM
The problem is our school board does not dare say a word to him
Kamal Makki February 23, 2013 at 02:53 PM
Very intelligently expressed – well done Lee
Gary LaPointe February 25, 2013 at 05:38 AM
This salary information is published on the front page of every public school web site in Michigan! It's a big button titled "Budget and Salary Compensation - Transparency Reporting" with a image of the state in the middle. It's a lot more than salaries, it's pages and pages of financial disclosures (operating, association dues, healthcare, and other budgeting). All districts have to list all staff making more the $100,000 (I'm not sure if that is salary or total compensation, I think just salary), Dearborn Public Schools seems to list about everyone all the way down to the people making $3,000 a year (it's the first time I've noticed that.
Gary LaPointe February 25, 2013 at 06:05 AM
Having worked in central office in several districts in Wayne County, I think it's pretty rare that a superintendent would work only 40 hours a week, 50 hours would probably be a short week. I'm just say that as a minimum throws those numbers off by 25%. It's also not my experience that the superintendent is out of the office the whole of Christmas break, winter break, spring breaks, snow days or days when they should be home sick. I'm sure some would gladly take $10 less an hour if it meant they could go home after 8 hours and not work during the breaks and be called at home when they are sick or on vacation. (That's just my opinion) I'm not sure what you mean with July not on the schedule, next July? At http://dearbornschools.org/web-calendar/month.calendar/2013/ they don't have anything for next year (yet) including a school start date. Some districts don't set the board calendar for the next year (starting July 1) until the last meeting in June. Some of my busiest time in the schools was the end of June and July. June was finalizing all the end of the year issues: finances, reporting, etc. July was starting everything up for the next year (which starts July) and ordering what needs to be ordered and getting everything ready for the current year.
Gary LaPointe February 25, 2013 at 06:09 AM
All districts in Michigan should have a finance transparency button on the front page of their web site. All salaries over $100,000 must be listed. Some districts (including Dearborn), list way more than that. FYI, It's reported by position, not by the persons name, so it might just say "elementary principal" but you might not know know which principal (but if it's only one, I'd guess it's the one with the most seniority).
Gary LaPointe February 25, 2013 at 06:17 AM
I was just thinking about this more. In one of my districts, we didn't get all those breaks off, central office administrators got 2 days for Christmas and 2 days for New Year, one day for Easter break. In another district, we got many of those breaks off, but many people were still in on many of those days (but that one gave less vacation days). To be clear, while I live in Dearborn, I have not worked for Dearborn Schools.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something