.
Feedback

Smart Meter Opt Out Legislation Would Eliminate DTE's Proposed Fees

DTE Energy offers customers an opportunity to decline the new wireless meters, but plans to charge one-time and monthly fees.

A Michigan lawmaker has introduced legislation to stop a proposed DTE Energy plan to charge customers who don't want new wireless "smart meters."

The Oakland Press reported Thursday that state Rep. Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills) has introduced legislation that would allow DTE customers to opt out of the new meters without paying a proposed $87 one-time fee and $15 monthly fee. 

“I have spoken with residents of our communities who say they have had serious health issues caused by smart meters, and I believe these apprehensions are legitimate," McMillin told the newspaper, adding he believes the meters also raise "privacy concerns."

DTE is installing 825,000 smart meters, also known as AMI meters, in southeast Michigan as part of an $83.8 million grant. Smart meters measure and record electricity usage with digital technology instead of the traditional gears and dials. The technology involves the use of radio frequency waves to transmit data to DTE.

In response to complaints from residents across the state, the Michigan Public Service Commission asked the utility to provide them with information on safety and privacy issues related to the smart meters; the MPSC also asked about the feasibility of an opt-out option.

DTE offered that option in March 2012—but not without requiring those who opt out to pay hefty fees.

Dearborn Patch readers joined many other Michigan residents in opposing the fees.

"So we had a program that was always free to us, and now they want to make themselves more profitable, and even if they get more profitability out of 95% of their customers, they want to charge the people that want the service they have always had for free," commented reader R.EALLY.

Reader Kathy Senczyszyn commented, however, that DTE "will have to pay one to come read the one meter that doesn't change."

AnnArbor.com reported Monday that Attorney General Bill Schuette filed a brief with the Michigan Public Service Commission that affirms the right of citizens to opt out and disputes DTE's fee calculations. In his brief, posted on the MPSC website, Schuette argues the one-time fee should be eliminated and the monthly fee reduced to under $10.

Health issues believed to be related to Smart Meters have been reported in communities across Michigan.

Residents quoted in a WXYZ-TV report on the proposed legislation said they experienced insomnia, tinnitus and other symptoms they believe are related to the smart meter installations.

The issue has also come before numerous city officials, including Dearborn City Council in July 2011, when a group opposing the meters spoke at a council meeting. The council chose not to file a resolution on the matter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dearborn Patch? Find your Local Patch »

bitsy08 March 2, 2013 at 03:31 pm
This came up at DH Council and they, too, put a hold on it. I "though" I heard on the news that this whole "Smart Meter" was put on hold until they could decide the safety of them before installing. This reminds me of when I had AT&T years ago and they told me they were going to charge me for NOT using long distance. They're not charging me all right. I canceled with them and went with someone else. It also seems to me that there are too many questions regarding the safety of these meters and if they can't prove they're safe, NO ONE should be forced to have one or pay to have one. Schuette wants to eliminate the one-time fee but still let us be charged monthly for the privilege of NOT having one? Thanks, Bill. I'd end up paying more with a smaller monthly fee than a one-time fee. Our politicians at work.
M. Imsosure March 2, 2013 at 05:56 pm
It's not just health concerns. It is an invasion by the power company. Watch this youtube :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI
It is not paranoia if they are really out to get you. HaHa
Aridog March 2, 2013 at 08:28 pm
We have big dogs who don't particularly like strangers, and definitely not in their yard when they are outside. We requested the RF Read meter about 3 years ago to avoid meter reader versus dog issues, and to relieve DTE of calling us 48 hours in advance of meter reader visits. No one has had a problem, least of all me, who sleeps with his head aproximately 24 inches from the meter on the the outside wall. As I write the meter is about 24 inches from this desk in the next room, my office.
Question 1: Everything I've heard or read about "problems" with radio frequency emionations has been casual and annecodotal....e.g., no scientific evidence. Has a study been done to validate this so called health concern vis a vis DTE's meters? If so, the results, please. Or is this a anecdotal collection of internet rumors? I ask becasue Many of us carry or have carried RF chips in various credit cards, debit cards (such as those by Chase bank, et al) ID cards, enhanced Michigan Driver's Licenses or Federal PASS Card for land/sea travel tofrom Canada, Mexico, and the Carribean, regular US Passports and many of other countries' as well, and have been near pets with RF ID chips embedded in their necks. You may have been near or have now bar code labels on products that are RF active inventory items, This technology is well over a decade old. So, is there any study of any of it anywhere that shows health risk with an even low confidence level of 90%? Anywhere? I'll listen.
Aridog March 2, 2013 at 08:39 pm
Question 2: Why does anyone think anything from DTE or any utility is "free?" You insist on DTE continuing to send meter readers out to record usage with 1930's technology. What's better? Rates not going up or continuing to pay meter readers to slowly check each meter? Would you be happy to drive 1930's automobiles, and do without televisions and computers, and wireless routers, ALL of which eminate RF signals....that router especially. You like Wi-Fi? Do you think that is Unicorn flatulence and not radio signal? Of course not.
I wonder how many of these health concerned citizens walk around or drive with a cello phone plastered agains ttheir head? Oh, wait.... that's just so unfair!
Chris King March 3, 2013 at 01:27 am
Please note there are over 200 million smart meters in operation globally, including 50 million in the U.S., without a single verified instance of negative health effects. You would have to stand in front of a smart meter for 19 years to get the same radiation as you get from a 5 minute cell phone call. There's more from the Smart Grid Consumer Collaborative (I'm on the Board) at www.smartgridcc.org.
Classius Clownius March 5, 2013 at 01:34 am
Smart Meters - something to be afraid of? http://www.squidoo.com/beware-of-smart-meters
Aridog March 5, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Article provides zero research data, just asseerts it exists, somewhere. No distinctionis made to the cfrequency of ENR....e.g., below X-radiation and ultra-violet, it is called "radio waves." Radia wacves can only do damage by generating het, such as in infra-red. B y akll meansm, if you head and skin heats up when you are near you DTE meter or your cell phone or television remote, immediately acquire and put on <a href="http://static4.fjcdn.com/comments/good+thing+i+have+a+tinfoil+hat+_29c311d12332af497cd6e11ff6b8c266.jpg">the only knwon antidote</a>.
Aridog March 5, 2013 at 01:04 pm
Try that link again: http://static4.fjcdn.com/comments/good+thing+i+have+a+tinfoil+hat+_29c311d12332af497cd6e11ff6b8c266.jpg
Aridog March 5, 2013 at 01:05 pm
Never mind...Patch doesn't like long links or html link.
bitsy08 March 5, 2013 at 02:28 pm
If worse comes to worse, I'LL read the meter rather than pay DTE. You can do that now. If for some reason the area where your meter resides is locked, you can either call the readings in or go on line and enter them. Of course, do you think they'd pay me to do their job?
Sean March 5, 2013 at 03:24 pm
Jesus Christ you people make my brain hurt.If you Big Brother is really coming after us, hoard as much food and as many guns as possible. Sleep with tinfoil hats to ensure they cannot read your mind at night. What proof to any of you have that these meters are a heatlh/evironmental/privacy/safety risk?
bitsy08 March 5, 2013 at 03:32 pm
Wow, Sean. Get a grip. At the present time I don't have any proof but there are enough people out there that are having problems that we've turned it over to the experts to decide. I don't necessarily believe it but I'd rather be safe than sorry. What I do have a problem with is them charging me to opt out and then charging me every month. What a crock!
Sean March 5, 2013 at 04:20 pm
The world is flat, vaccines cause autism, 9-11 was an inside job, Obama is a space muslim, fluoride is a tool of the NWO and Tupac lives! Continue to believe a .jpeg your friends posted "exposing the truth behind meters" http://www.dteenergy.com/pdfs/smartMeterWhitePaper.pdf
Aridog March 5, 2013 at 10:10 pm
Actually DTE is one of the power providers that doesn't, at present, charge for meter reading as a separate "fee." Their mistake...they should have always been charging for meter reading, then everyone in the local area would be doing teh happy joy dance about the discount obtained by the electronically read meters. Heck, folks would be lining up demanding them.
As for EMR...short of intense ultraviolet, microwave, and unregulated gamma X-radiation, do get a tin foil hat. EMR can only do harm through heat generation and if your TV remote, cell phone, television, wireless land line phones, and sundry other everyday devices cause you to overheat...do put on a tin foil suit, or get a room, whatever works.. Oh, and dispose of any new credit or debit cards if you see a nifty semi circle with multiple semi-rings on the back of it...that means it is read by RFID. Potenailly it could burn your backside or set your purse on fire. If you need tin foil gear, please write to Kooki Gear iz Uz, Inc, 1234 Ding Dong Street, D'brn, 48126 .... or just write the Mayor, I'm sure he is concerned too...since he obviously was delusional when he said the new city hall O&M costs would be $7.50/SF/year, back in 2010. Maybe it wuz EMR! He's busy putting a new city hall together and we can't have any RF emitters in thar now, heah? I'm sorry for this post...the Debbil made me do it. :-))
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tom B June 18, 2013 at 07:42 pm
Way too much for a college having financial problems.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Here is a copy of the terms of service. http://dearborn.patch.com/terms We will not tolerateRead More readers posting with curse words or attacking other readers. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice week. If you require further clarification, you are welcome to email me.
Gary Woronchak June 12, 2013 at 10:32 am
Hasn't even worked one day? Not one day in 15 years? Really? Not even credit for one day? When IRead More worked at the Press & Guide (which eliminated my position in a budget restructuring that has continued under various corporate owners at the P&G for a decade and a half, resulting in them moving their offices to Southgate and more recently just out-and-out eliminating their editor, sports editor and photographer) we had a policy of no anonymous letters to the editor. This was done because, while everyone has the right to express their opinion, putting a real name with an opinion meant people displayed more decorum and, well, less cowardice than is allowed in online comments from the shadows. Joseph, the benefit of post-employment health care after just eight years of service may have, in the early 1990s, been more acceptable in some way I can't figure (retention of key department heads has been cited as a reason, as was that it apparently mirrored a benefit for state officials), but it clearly was part of the excesses of Wayne County that was unjustifiable and unsustainable in the 2000s. This practice was ended two years ago by a resolution I introduced.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:22 am
The original comment has been deleted because it violates our terms of service.
Joseph Borrajo June 13, 2013 at 10:08 am
Thank you Gary Woroncahk for the response.
laplateau June 11, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yeah, unless the drinking trough is filled with taxpayer water.
laplateau June 10, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Joseph, Are you bordering upon slander? Is this the reason for no more info? I hope you are not.Read More Perhaps you are picking up on some nasty rumors and repeating them here. You should know better than to do that. So, if you have real proof, tell it like it is and don't hedge. What you are saying in your post is dangerous to you and those who you are referring to, so, as the saying goes...put up or shut up.
Judith Lundy June 10, 2013 at 05:56 pm
Whether or not the facts of this opinion piece are true, I thoroughly believe Robert McNamara wasRead More the personal trainer for Kwame Kilpatrick. McNamera would have been spending a lot of time in prison if he didn't die. Ficano is a joke in my estimation. I know no one who wants him to remain in office. With today's survellience techniques and high tech gadgets, politicians can no longer get away with what they did in the past.
Joseph Borrajo June 10, 2013 at 10:19 pm
Follow the money!