.
Feedback

UPDATE: Report on Earnings of City Employees Inaccurate, Says Mayor

A report from the Mackinac Center for Public Policy claims that some Dearborn department heads received exorbitant raises in 2011. Not so, says the city.

A report published Feb. 20 by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy on the 2011 earnings of some Dearborn city department heads is grossly misleading, Mayor Jack O'Reilly said Thursday.

The report from the conservative policy think tank says that at the same time the city was asking residents to vote to raise taxes, they were giving large salary increases of up to 12.8 percent for some city officials.

Capitol Confidential, the Mackinac Center's publication, quotes one of its own experts, chastising the city for the double standard.

“When they’re pushing tax hikes, residents hear a lot from local government officials about ‘shared sacrifice,’” said Jack McHugh, the legislative analyst for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. “These figures give the appearance that the sharing stops at the city hall door.”

According to the city, the report's numbers were gross earnings of listed employees for 2011–including the heads of recreation, economic and community development, finance, information systems, public works, public information and the executive assistant to the mayor.

Those earnings range from $96,000-$131,000, but O'Reilly said that includes base salary plus things like longevity payments to employees serving 10 years or longer, mileage and payout for unused paid time off. City officials said those totals varied greatly from the base salary levels for those department heads.

Salaries in 2011 for those same employees ranged from approximately $85,000-$112,000, he said.

In 2011, O'Reilly explained, gross earnings also included a one-time payout of retroactive salary increases–1 percent in 2008 and 2 percent in 2009. The retroactive increase was based on the resolution of contracts for union employees, but was also applied to salaried department heads, who are non-union.

The total increase in pay was also applied to 2011, meaning that all city employees make 3 percent more now than they did in 2010.

"The year 2011 was different because union contracts had expired and we had to negotiate," he said. "We negotiated for two (retroactive) years on contracts."

The retroactive pay was applied as a one-time lump sum in 2011, accounting for much of the pay difference from the previous year.

Salary increases for appointed department heads are not decided by the mayor, but made under a city charter mandate that allows those appointees to receive "an average of up to the same annual increases and decreases negotiated within city unions." Those pay increases are approved by city council.

Addionally, unioned employees are eligible for overtime, shift pay and step increases; department heads are not.

"Department heads don't have to get increases with union contracts," O'Reilly explained, "but the city decided they should in 2010-11."

Furthermore, O'Reilly touted Dearborn's hands-off system, saying it prevents politics from playing a part in pay negotiations.

"Department heads become a political issue (in other cities)," he said. "Here, that can't happen. We've got a good system."

No pay increases will be applied in 2012. Additionally, all city departments are being asked to make a 10 percent reduction in personnel costs this year, which could come in the form of pay cuts, pre-tax cuts, pension contributions, or other negotiable forms. That request includes police and fire unions.

Director of Public Information Mary Laundroche also said that longevity payments, which are applied to all full-time city employees after a period of 10 years, were on the discussion table for 2012 cuts. However, the elimination of the payments for union employees would have to be negotiated through their contracts.

Correction: This article was clarified to explain that the 3 percent raise was a one-time increase in salary levels for department heads, 2 percent of which was also applied retroactively to 2009 pay and 1 percent of which was also applied retroactively to 2008 pay.

The Bear February 24, 2012 at 01:17 pm
So, the city applied wages retroactively, boosting the salaries a bit which lead to an increase? That's it? I'm not sure why the headline of this article says 'inaccurate'....there is not a single thing pointed out in the article that shows this.
From the original article: http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/16485 Some of the city's key officials saw considerable boosts in pay: The Director of Economic and Community Develop saw his gross pay increase from $95,667 in 2010 to $104,509 in 2011, a 9.2 percent increase. The Director of Finance saw his gross pay increase from $107,912 in 2010 to $116,624 in 2011, an 8 percent increase. The Director of the Information Systems Department saw his gross pay increase from $102,491 in 2010 to $113,994 in 2011, an 11.2 percent increase. The Director of Public Information saw her gross pay increase from $85,886 in 2010 to $96,056 in 2011, an 11.8 percent increase. The Director of Public Works saw his gross pay increase from $102,193 in 2010 to $110,612 in 2011, an 8.2 percent increase. The Director of Recreation saw his gross pay increase from $94,312 in 2010 to $106,395 in 2011, a 12.8 percent increase. The Executive Assistant to the Mayor made $117,899 in 2010 and $131,162 in 2011, a 11.2 percent increase. The article also clearly states that some employees went down in pay.
marooned in Dbn February 24, 2012 at 01:23 pm
Whatever you do...just keep on passing tax increases for the good of the Dept. Heads of the city.
Abigail Heinrich February 24, 2012 at 02:05 pm
Situation normal. O'Reilly talks a good show, but we know he is not telling the truth. And, I sure wish they would have mentioned the Library Director's salary in the study. Ms. Bartles is one of the best paid library directors in the state of Michigan.
Jan February 24, 2012 at 02:33 pm
Longevity payments??? Sounds like the stuff coming from Robert Ficano! Meanwhile, they're closing pools and libraries. Sad!
Jessica Carreras (Editor) February 24, 2012 at 02:55 pm
O'Reilly did mention that the city did a study in the early 2000s looking at other comparable cities' salaries for department heads, and that they do like their rates to be competitive to retain what he called "an incredible amount of experience in our department heads."
That's also the purpose of the "longevity payments" - to retain talent. However, O'Reilly said he'd like to do away with those. Not sure why he hasn't already.
Joe Schramek February 24, 2012 at 04:13 pm
I bet none of the city managers will leave this benevolent city now. I guess the moves to raise taxes to offset reduced tax revenue was unnecessary maybe. Did anyone tell Disneyland about the lump sum payments as I bet their attendances will swell too in the immediate future. How about lottery sales, casino businesses, and sport events attendance too? The sad story here is that it raised the bar for city expenses that will cause future tax increase as the economy further declines as governments try to keep the citizens happy with more salary increase with no growth in service or well-being in the community.
Dearborn Taxpayer February 24, 2012 at 05:27 pm
The mayor's explanation shows his incompetence and narrow mindset. Those of us in the private sector have long looked at "Total Annual Compensation" as our direct out-of-pocket employee cost. The fact is that there are many City of Dearborn administrators who had a total annual compensation increase; there is no inaccuracy about this. Many of us taxpayers have already taken pay and total compensation cuts over the last five years while some city employees are receiving "longevity payments" and "retroactive pay increases." It seems our mayor is now pleading to be powerless to actually control these out-of-pocket costs. At the same time, he and his cronies on the City Council are powerful enough to raise our taxes. Give me a break Mayor!
Rita Dennaoui February 24, 2012 at 06:08 pm
Rita Dennaoui
Nothing about this city surprises me. Maybe the mayor can give me a break for having paid taxes for the last 20 years. by enforcing regulations and reminding people to clean in front of their homes, and parking vehicles are for cars, suv vans, not freight trucks in residential areas. I am so disgusted with this city, that they are no better than Detroil
Carla O'Neill February 24, 2012 at 07:15 pm
Out of curiosity---why does the photo show the mayor holding what appears to be a blow dryer in his hand?
Donna Hay February 24, 2012 at 07:56 pm
He probably has to appoint a committee to study this and then bring in an agency to study the committee findings and on and on. He is hopeing that everyone will just forget the whole thing and all will be fine once again.
Jessica Carreras (Editor) February 24, 2012 at 07:56 pm
Readers: This story has been updated with more information about the longevity payments. They are applied to all employees and they are on the table for 2012 discussions about budget cuts.
Jessica Carreras (Editor) February 24, 2012 at 08:00 pm
Good eye, Carla! The photo was taken at the Adopt-A-Watt program unveiling in November. It's hard to find a photo of the mayor not standing behind a podium. He is holding an electric vehicle charger.
Lee Jacobsen February 24, 2012 at 09:07 pm
Jess, I thought he was holding a bar code reader, and reading off the crib notes in his hand all of the increases, and how to explain them away.....
Another item that should be addressed is the elimination of 'justification' costs, costs which are paid to Dearborn employees to justify the savings the city gets when the employee chooses other than city health care plans. That should be an employee decision, pick your spouses or your city healthcare plan, but no extra money if you choose your spouse's plan. The private sector went that direction years ago, and , in the end, it saves money through the elimination of paperwork. That would save the city hundreds of thousands of dollars. Regarding the Mackinaw article, it states gross increases in pay, and those are the facts. How they occurred are the Mayor's podium of explanation. Bottom line, the city employees are tied into the union contracts, and benefiting despite negotiating at the table in our behalf with the unions. The city negotiators were 'self-serving' . Those increases should be recinded.
marooned in Dbn February 24, 2012 at 09:43 pm
I wrote similar statements at the time of the property tax vote, Dbn Taxpayer. I hope you voted NO on that tax increase, and are not a recent convert.
marooned in Dbn February 24, 2012 at 09:48 pm
All the more reason to have a series of re-call elections across the cities of America. Thanks for the information Editor Jessica. Any politician that advocates whole series of pay increases, just because other cities have them, is NOT attentive to the city's residents, who for the most part, have suffered pay reductions, since 2008.
marooned in Dbn February 24, 2012 at 10:01 pm
I rejoice that another person states that the property tax increase was unnessary. I am sure that there are many more that think the same. Since the power set in this city claims the vote for the increase was 60% YES, can I suggest United Nations observation on the next such property tax vote, because who can you trust in this environment, counting that vote ? I say again, there is going to be hardship trying to meet this new artificial tax obligation. Almost funny when the power set in this city lives thru good times, property valuations are yearly increased...with nary a whimper from the public. When we are reduced to an 8 to 10 dollar wage economy, and the values of your homes plunge, the same electorate still volunter to pay more. I find this suspicious.
marooned in Dbn February 24, 2012 at 10:04 pm
I wish he were holding a pen, after just signing his resignation letter.
Fuzzy Buzzy February 24, 2012 at 11:35 pm
Fuzzy Guy... Resident of Dearborn for 60 years. Always lived in Aviation Sub. As I drive in and around my local streets I see plastic bottles laying on laws,sidewalks and curbside. I see cars, vans and trucks with "dealer" plates parked in drivways and curbside all the time dispite the new ordinance, In the summer I see nice laws and horrible lawns, I see garbage cans sitting out at curbside before 5 PM and, then still sitting beyond the legal time for placing in the yard after trash pick-up. Now I read the city is paying "longevity" payments. It seems the administration is crying poverty to the taxpayers but eating filet migon in the inner circle. The salary scales for the department heads are way out of line for the Dearborn economic demographic, Try calling the city administratioin offices on a Sat or Holiday to get very basic information. What you will get is a very nice recorded message to call back on a business day. Sad day for residents when the lights go out at city hall for the generous tax payer.
joe terry February 28, 2012 at 05:59 pm
He (the mayor) is the poorest excuse for a leader that you can find. if no one was in that position I think we would fair better as a city.
sick and tired of the bs March 7, 2012 at 06:08 am
The department heads should be reclassified as bobble heads. afterall, all they do is say "yes sir mr. mayor, whatever you want mr. mayor, whatever you say mr. mayor." give me a break. will someone with some brains and guts please run for mayor? we are all stuck here with homes that we'll never be able to sell. something's got to change. we are becoming a rental community with high crime. what's next? bars on our windows? and don't get me started on the lack of businesses in the west end.
sick and tired of the bs

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dearborn Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tom B June 18, 2013 at 07:42 pm
Way too much for a college having financial problems.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Here is a copy of the terms of service. http://dearborn.patch.com/terms We will not tolerateRead More readers posting with curse words or attacking other readers. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice week. If you require further clarification, you are welcome to email me.
Gary Woronchak June 12, 2013 at 10:32 am
Hasn't even worked one day? Not one day in 15 years? Really? Not even credit for one day? When IRead More worked at the Press & Guide (which eliminated my position in a budget restructuring that has continued under various corporate owners at the P&G for a decade and a half, resulting in them moving their offices to Southgate and more recently just out-and-out eliminating their editor, sports editor and photographer) we had a policy of no anonymous letters to the editor. This was done because, while everyone has the right to express their opinion, putting a real name with an opinion meant people displayed more decorum and, well, less cowardice than is allowed in online comments from the shadows. Joseph, the benefit of post-employment health care after just eight years of service may have, in the early 1990s, been more acceptable in some way I can't figure (retention of key department heads has been cited as a reason, as was that it apparently mirrored a benefit for state officials), but it clearly was part of the excesses of Wayne County that was unjustifiable and unsustainable in the 2000s. This practice was ended two years ago by a resolution I introduced.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:22 am
The original comment has been deleted because it violates our terms of service.
Joseph Borrajo June 13, 2013 at 10:08 am
Thank you Gary Woroncahk for the response.
laplateau June 11, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yeah, unless the drinking trough is filled with taxpayer water.
laplateau June 10, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Joseph, Are you bordering upon slander? Is this the reason for no more info? I hope you are not.Read More Perhaps you are picking up on some nasty rumors and repeating them here. You should know better than to do that. So, if you have real proof, tell it like it is and don't hedge. What you are saying in your post is dangerous to you and those who you are referring to, so, as the saying goes...put up or shut up.
Judith Lundy June 10, 2013 at 05:56 pm
Whether or not the facts of this opinion piece are true, I thoroughly believe Robert McNamara wasRead More the personal trainer for Kwame Kilpatrick. McNamera would have been spending a lot of time in prison if he didn't die. Ficano is a joke in my estimation. I know no one who wants him to remain in office. With today's survellience techniques and high tech gadgets, politicians can no longer get away with what they did in the past.
Joseph Borrajo June 10, 2013 at 10:19 pm
Follow the money!