UPDATE: Terry Jones Arrested, Released on $1 Bond

A jury on Friday afternoon determined after a day of court hearings that Florida Pastor Terry Jones and his associate Wayne Sapp would be likely to breach the peace. A bond was set at $1.

Quran-burning Florida Pastor Terry Jones and his associate Wayne Sapp posted bond and were released an hour after being arrested and jailed today for refusing at first to pay the $1 bond set for each of them.

Judge Mark Somers set the $1 peace bond after a six-person jury decided in Dearborn's 19th District Court that Jones and Sapp were likely to breach the peace through a planned protest.

The bond was set on condition that Jones and Sapp not enter the premises of the Islamic Center of America or the nearby area for three years. Jones and Sapp had planned to protest Friday near the center.

The Wayne County prosecutor's office confirmed this evening that Jones and Sapp  both posted bond about an hour after their 7 p.m. arrest and were released from the Wayne County Jail.

After the arrest, a crowd of about 20 protesters surrounded the police car with Jones inside at the courthouse, shouting things like, "Jones is a racist." They also surrounded and heckled Jones supporter David Grisham, a Texas pastor who had come to testify on Jones and Sapp's behalf.

Jones and his fellow demonstrators, several of whom were called as witnesses in court, said earlier Friday that they would attempt to protest at the no matter what the jury decided – even if that meant they would be arrested for their actions.

"We're willing to go to jail for it," said Rabbi Nachum Shifren, a witness called by Sapp to testify. Shifren said he was planning to join them at the protest at the Islamic Center, the nation's largest mosque.

The prosecutor had asked for a $45,000 bond.

The ACLU of Michigan had filed a friend of the court brief, Communications Director Rana Elmir said, "on behalf of the principle that if the First Amendment means anything, it means that the government cannot interfere in a person’s free speech simply because it doesn’t agree with the message or because someone else may not agree with the message."

The ACLU had asked that Judge Somers to throw out the verdict if the jury found Sapp and Jones likely to breach the peace. "Our government cannot put a price on free speech because of the reactions of another group," she added.

Morning Testimony

As court came into session Friday morning just before 9 a.m., Jones and Sapp sported Harley-Davidson T-shirts, with Jones' now-signature leather jacket slung over his chair.

Opening arguments for Jones and Sapp centered around First Amendment rights to free speech.

“You may not agree with what we’ve done," Jones said of his Quran burning during the jury trial Friday in Dearborn's . "This is, to a certain extent, a First Amendment issue ... and the First Amendment does us no good if it confines us to saying what popular opinion is.”

Wayne County Assistant Prosecutor and Chief of Special Investigations Robert Moran saw things differently. He noted that Dearborn Police denied Jones' event permit, but also told him that he and his associates could demonstrate in one of the city's free speech zones "in the interest of public safety."

“They said 'No,'" Moran said. "They said, 'We’re going to come demonstrate where we want, when we want, regardless of the law.'”

Jones contended that free speech zones are "ridiculous."

"All we want to do is exercise our First Amendment rights," Jones said. "Those free-speech zones are absolutely ridiculous. Freedom of speech does not have speech zones."

Several witnesses were called, including Dearborn Police Chief Ronald Haddad, who stated he believed it "would be totally irresponsible" for his department to have granted Jones' permit request to demonstrate in front of the Islamic Center of America. He added that he believed it was likely that someone would commit a violent act at the protest.

"There’s a strong likelihood that an instigator will be there and violence will occur," Haddad said. "I hope it doesn’t, but I have grave concern based on the intelligence we’ve developed."

Other Voices

Several concerned citizens came into the courtroom during a mid-morning break and spoke with Sapp, urging both him and Jones to take home a different view of Dearborn.

"We might not change (Jones and Sapp's) views on Islam and Muslims in America, but ... when you go back to Florida, at least be open minded enough to acknowledge the fact that we are different here in Dearborn," said Mahdi Saad, a Dearborn resident and Muslim. "Maybe we can’t change your view of Muslims all around the world. But at least go back with a different view of the people in Dearborn."

The hearing was originally set for Thursday before Judge Mark Somers, but was at Jones' request after he denied the option of paying a bond set by Somers.

Jones' original protest was set for 5-8 p.m. Friday evening at the Islamic Center The city, however, denied his permit request due to space and safety issues–a decision that Judge Somers agreed with. The Wayne County prosecutor's office then on April 15, asserting that they had reason to believe that Jones would breach the peace and incite a riot.

Meanwhile, at the Islamic Center, local religious leaders met Friday morning to call for peace and nonviolence.

Stay with Dearborn Patch today as this story unfolds. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, as well.

Larry Ludwick April 23, 2011 at 01:35 PM
Several points: The story published is misleading. Terry Jones did not request a jury trial. He refused to post bond which automatically took it to a jury trial. Terry Jones was arrested to prevent him from walking on a public street carrying a sign. He was held in jail and the courtroom long enough to prevent him from carrying out his plan of protest. To M. Greene -- the Constitution does indeed give you the right to offend others with your speech. Otherwise, what's the point of the first amendment. No one will mind speech they agree with. The right to say things others find offensive is the *first* amendment to our Constitution because the founding fathers held it to be most important. I haven't seen anyone comment on the concept of false imprisonment or illegal search and seizure. To arrest a man because he says he's going to protest is clearly a violation of the First Amendment and is probalby a violation of the Sixth.
Melissa White April 23, 2011 at 01:48 PM
Mr. Ludwick, the first amendment definitely gives you the right to free speech - and it is currently restricted to "free speech areas" - did you miss that point? We have the right to also be protected from crazy people demonstrating on public or private property without permission to do so. That is the police department's job, and they did their job. There have been many other people who have been similarly turned down in their unreasonable requests. Even people striking have to have permits, and they have to observe laws so no one is hurt by their actions; and striking is a right that is woven in the fabric of American history. In terms of your ridiculous comment on "false imprisonment"-give me a break!!! The guy refused to pay a $1 bond. Obviously he wanted to be arrested to make more "news". Stop twisting things around. Any sane, reasonable individual can see this grandstanding joker for exactly what he is. Why the heck are we giving him more than his 15 minutes???
Larry Ludwick April 23, 2011 at 04:54 PM
He was arrested to prevent him from making political or religious speech. Your characterization Rev. Perry as 'crazy' is typical of those who don't believe in the exchange of ideas. He doesn't agree with you so he must be crazy. Being restricted to 'free speech areas' is not free speech, it's restricted speech. Location aside, the Constitution was thrown out the window because Rev. Perry did not speak anywhere. He did not hold a protest. He didn't pose a threat to anyoone. He was arrested for having an opinion and held to keep him from speaking about it. Whether you agree with him or not (and I don't care about him one way or the other), his rights as a citizen of the United States were severely abused.
William Wallace April 24, 2011 at 02:52 AM
Look where this happend in a city full of muslims in a liberal state with a liberal judge. Of course they would try and stop his basic rights as a citizens of america. Its his LEGAL right to protest anywhere he wants to in public property. He can LEGALLY stand on a sidewalk and protest. Any real judge would uphold that right. The cops should be there to make sure it doesnt get out of hand but as long as he doesnt get assaulted or start a fight its just fine to do what he wanted. This man may not be the nicest guy or show the best judgement but he has the right to protest in public and say what ever he wishes. If people dont like it they dont have to be there and listen. Let him protest and then he can go home happy. As to the part about its his fault for the deaths of UN workers. Thats a crock. The ignorant muslims in that country are at fault. They proved his point to boot. The point of his outburst is to prove Islam is not a peaceful religion and he proved it. A simple book was burned and they ignorant members of a religous group incited there followers and they killed. Terry jones just caused them to show there true colors.
James White September 12, 2013 at 03:05 AM
geesh freedom of speech for American's hum or mualims hum thought this was america


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »