.
Feedback

Health Department Closure May Push Patients to Seek Alternate Resources

The Dearborn City Council will likely shut down its health department amid a sea of fiscal worries and a $20-million budget shortfall.

A fixture in the city of Dearborn that has supported the medical needs of thousands of city residents will no longer exist after June 30, pending approval of the 2011-12 budget.

The Dearborn Health Department–one of the last city-managed health authorities in Michigan–will close its doors as part of the to solve a $20-million budget deficit.

The move is expected to save the city about $170,000 per year, according to Dearborn Finance Director Jim O’Connor.

The elimination of the department will also mean the layoffs of a part-time director, a full-time nurse, three part-time nurses and a part-time doctor.

For the city, closing the department means reducing services that can be obtained by residents through other resources.

“One of my jobs is to look at what services are potentially duplicated services and cut those,” said Mayor Jack O’Reilly. “It’s unfortunate–but we have to retain the services that only we can provide and that’s how we’re approaching this budget.”

But for residents–12,000 to 15,000 of whom seek out the department each year to receive low-cost services or referrals–services will become less convenient, but not impossible, to obtain.

The Dearborn Health Department offers services such as immunizations, blood pressure checks for seniors, cholesterol checks, tuberculosis tests, well-baby classes and lectures on demand by a registered nurse, among others. The department does operate an on-site clinic located in the lower level of the , but also offers referrals to agencies that can provide more complex care to low-income and uninsured individuals.

The department was budgeted at $393, 232, including $183, 250 for potential revenue, for the 2010-11 fiscal year, according to city finances. The city will not save that entire budgeted amount because the revenue stream created from nominal fees paid by clients to the health department will not be realized, O’Connor said.

Residents will most likely turn to the Wayne County Health Department on Van Born Road in Wayne and the , which operates a full-service medical resource center and clinic that is open to everyone in the community.

Michelle Sanchez, medical director for ACCESS, said there will be a ripple felt in the city.

“The health department offered immunizations that were very inexpensive for people who could not afford them–especially for adults,” she said.

“I do think that we’ll be fine; we have doctors on-site every day and we have referrals to the Wayne County Health Department on Van Born Road,” she said. “And we’re open to everyone in the community.”

The clinic at ACCESS offers services on a sliding scale for individuals who meet low-income guidelines or do not have medical insurance.

The Wayne County Health Department’s western Wayne County office also has medical services, but serves a large swath of the county, as do its offices in Detroit.

But for municipal governments, which have seen their property tax income eroded and their state aid dry up in long recession, the last few years have been especially difficult. Dearborn is no exception.

And for health authorities run by local governments, the economic downturn creates a cycle of need among residents at the precise time resources and dollars are disappearing, said Robert Pestronk, the executive director or the National Association of City and County Health Officials in Washington, DC.

“Everyone at public health authorities–from the directors to the board members to the employees–are struggling to figure out how to meet the needs of the communities they serve,” said Pestronk, who was formerly a health official in Genesee County.

“The cutbacks are coming from the local, state and federal levels and most of our members are looking for ways to partner up or to share resources,” he said. “They’re trying to find ways to keep delivering the services expected of them with far fewer resources.”

In Dearborn, staffing cuts, the closure of pools and libraries and changes in how public services are administered are all on the table as the city’s budget process lurches forward.

O’Reilly said he expects the decision to close the health department will be unpopular with many residents.

“We’re facing many unprecedented, tough choices,” he said. “The closure of the health department is one of those.”

Other Resources

Once the Dearborn Health Department closes its doors, residents who used the department will seek low-cost services from other agencies. Here’s a few that accept Medicare and Medicaid, and offer reduced-rate services.

1. Wayne County Health and Human Services
Taylor Health Center
26650 Eureka, Suite B, Taylor, 48180
734-955-3900

2. Wayne County Health and Human Services
Wayne Health Center
33030 Van Born Road, Wayne, 48184
734-727-7100

3. Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services
Community Health & Research Center
6450 Maple Street, Dearborn, 48126
313-216-2200

4. Western Wayne Family Health Center – Inkster
2500 Hamlin Drive
Inkster, 48141
313-561-5100

5. University of Michigan Dental School
School of Dentistry
1011 N. University, Ann Arbor, 48109
734-763-6933

6. University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry
Corktown Campus
2700 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Detroit, 48208
313-494-6700

Dental Clinic at University Health Center/Detroit Receiving Hospital
4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, 48201
313-494-6700

Web resources:

 1. The Michigan Department of Community Health

http://michigan.gov/mdch

2. Western Wayne Family Health Centers

http://www.wwfhcinkster.org/

3. Wayne County Health and Human Services

http://www.waynecounty.com/hhs_services.htm

Lee Jacobsen May 23, 2011 at 09:50 pm
When times are tough, it means cutting services that, while useful, are easily obtained elsewhere. Dearborn should be concentrating on the basic services such as fire and safety, garbage pickup and keeping the city clean. Health services are an 'extra' that we , as a city, cannot afford anymore. Wayne county has identical health care services including visiting home health care nurses. There are other services as well, some cover various aspects of health, and many are free, such as the American Red Cross, which is run and supported to a large extent by volunteers.
The money saved could keep the libraries, pools, golf course , and skating rink open. Eventually we will be 'worry free' concerning healthcare, as Obamacare kicks in and folk are told their options concerning receiving healthcare, (if and when) or alternatives.
Frank Lee May 24, 2011 at 03:46 am
Health care is a scarce service. It's demand exceeds supply. Therefor it's rationed. Today it's is rationed by money, tomorrow it will be rationed by government fiat. Either way there is always some other third party involved in the payment process. Today HMO's and insurance companies dictate to the doctors what treatments patients will ultimately receive, in the future government will have a bigger say. Health care costs are greatly exceeding economic growth and public decisions will be made on who will or won't receive care. This is a fact of life. Using words like Obmacare, simply show you want to reduce a morally and economically complex situation to an easily understood and completely false narrative. Spare us your reactionary talking points and Learn to think for yourself.
Lee Jacobsen May 24, 2011 at 09:53 am
In the future, many doctors will simply give up with the government program, hang out their shingle, and go 'private'. Many are already doing this, refusing to take medicare and medicaid patients, since the govt pays little and the paperwork is 'lots'. Many folk will skip ins.
As a result, doctors will see more patients, do less paperwork, charge less , and take cash or credit cards on the spot. With less staff needed for paperwork, they will make more money. We , the patients , don't have to deal with the govt system. We will get immediate care. Insurance companies will still offer catastrophic insurance for the 'big' stuff. This is already common now in the USA, with clinics offering large discounts for paying cash or Visa and not using an insurance plan. Ask your doctor if it is less $$ if you mention 'no insurance ' and can pay direct. The average is about 30 - 40% less. Of course, the govt can pass a law, like Canada, making the doctors bound to a certain policy and salary. Those doctors, many of them, will simply retire, or go 'underground'. That is common enough in Canada, where the average wait for a MRI scan is 3 months. Have a lump in your breast? Come back in 5 weeks and we will check it out. Cancerous? We can operate in 4 to 6 weeks. Or you can go to the USA and have it done the next day. Decisions on healthcare will still be made on 'ability to pay'. The poor will still lose out just by the length of the wait.
Frank Lee May 24, 2011 at 12:59 pm
Ok if you think that not using insurance is going to bring down health care costs down your a fool. Clinic care is for urgent care and not for chronic illness or injury. Acute injury and illness is not driving up health care costs, chronic illness and injuries are. So clinics do provide a low cost alternative for limited care they can never bend the health care cost curve in a meaningful way. Doctors cannot individually afford to provide the organization, capital formation, and technology needed to effectively compete against the increasing consolidation of corporatized health providers. Private doctors are decreasing yearly and in ten years will be as rare as doctors delivering babies in your living room. So while boutique care for privileged clientele, may be increasing, health care options provided by private care doctors to the general public will soon be non existent. Go to Oakwood and see if there is a cash discount you will be laughed at. There is simply no way to decrease health care costs without incentivizing outcomes and healthy lifestyles, so while your ideas sound great to people without a grasp of simple facts, in the real world they are factually incorrect. Simply put health care does not react to traditional market forces because people like to live to much. So individuals making rational choices in their self interest do not apply because human nature is to survive at all cost.
Lee Jacobsen May 25, 2011 at 01:04 am
Chronic care usually comes at the end of the life cycle. It involves hospitals and long term care. Choices will be made, and those with foresight, planning, and , as a result, savings, will have money enough to pay for immediate healthcare and survive. Those with Obama Care will be put on a waiting list, and, after months of waiting, will get some sort of treatment that is not what they expect. These are generally the folk that are not planners, or savers, and trust their govt. Sound far-fetched? Look to the North, and check out Canada's healthcare system. There is a reason 'rider' healthcare policies that provide treatment in the USA are very popular. When you are sick, need an operation, and don't want to wait, I hope you are are a 'planner' and 'saver'. With Govt care, the long wait will be the norm.
Folk often do what is easier. Right now, as a young doctor with student loans to pay off, it is easier to accept a job with a hospital or health care clinci and work normal hours as a doctor. Those who are more 'creative' will fill the more lucretive niches in health care later on with private practices on the side. For now, opening a private practice is not affordable to many doctors just starting out. Who knows but we may end up going to India for affordable healthcare surgery and faster treatment. http://www.healthtoursindia.com/general-surgery-cost.htm where costs are 1/5th to 1/10th to those of the USA. See link for cost details.
Frank Lee May 25, 2011 at 01:42 am
There is no method in which health care for those over 60 can be strictly market driven. Most individuals over 45 are uninsurable in the private market anyhow, The cost to insure and prepare for end of life care would exceed most Americans total life time discretionary earnings. How does one prepare for 250,000 dollars in costs if one never earned 250,000 dollars. That being said your argument sounds incredibly stupid. The only things every honest economist will agree on is that there are limits to what markets can accomplish. That markets can and will collapse. Markets are not always self correcting . Market driven outcomes are not always socially desirable results. So your reactionary nonsense and vulgar economic extrapolations may make for interesting reading in the comment section of the Blaze, here you sound like a fool. Lastly I did not vote for Obama, and I do not support his health care policy. Logical people can argue the extant of government intrusion into markets. Logical people do not argue that public policy and markets are mutually exclusive.
Lee Jacobsen May 25, 2011 at 05:53 am
What do you do, just pull numbers out of thin air? Where did this $250,000 figure come from for 'end of life ' care.?
Is that the projected cost with the govt handling it? Right now, the cost is under $17,000, see link. http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/2006-10-18-end-of-life-costs_x.htm Where are your sources for the statement that folk over 45 are uninsurable? Health care insurance is no different than car or life insurance. One buys the coverage that they want, and life goes on. For some inane reason, you feel that people should not have to worry about their health, and that the govt should hold their hand. That all health care is free as a society benefit. Why should I have to pay for people who are too ignorant to plan for their own health? Since 47% of people do not pay taxes anyway, http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/30/pf/taxes/who_pays_taxes/index.htm of course they want the govt to pay for their healthcare, since they are not contributing to the cost. For some reason, you do not hold these folk accountable for their actions. Regarding health care policy, I suggest we fix the system that we have, add tort reform, and make it so anyone can be insured if they want to , and can pay for it without issue. Charities are another source of help. Not the scam charities, but the honest ones.
Frank Lee May 25, 2011 at 02:22 pm
You are out of your league and treading water. Your reactionary views are laughable and have no merit. Your deceptive and false fact that 47% of people don't pay taxes, I have already debunked. Your deceptive claim that corporate income tax is the honest in the OECD I debunked as false. Health care is completely different from automobile insurance. The levels of asymmetrical information involved in purchasing health polices and treatment are astronomical compared to car care. I can shop around a engine overhaul, how do I shop around a heart transplant, or cancer treatments, or kidney dialysis. The outcomes on car insurance are the same across the board. It is very common for individuals with heart disease, cancer, or kidney dialysis to exceed $250,00o in care in only a few years. Individuals suffering from depression, obesity, high blood pressure, back pain, infertility, problem pregnancies are classified as pre existing conditions and uninsurable in private markets. How many people over 45 does not suffer from one of the above? You claim you want to hold people accountable, yet your first solution to fixing an inefficient health delivery system is to take away peoples right to hold providers accountable for negligence. It is funny how every solution you propose benefits the corporation over the individual. You are an ignorant crank who does not know what you don't know
Lee Jacobsen May 25, 2011 at 03:51 pm
Debunked? Show me the links to back up your assertions. Anyone can make claims on the internet, that does not make them true, even for you.
Health care is a service just like any other. The only reason it is complicated is due to govt regulation. I can go to several companies and get quotes for car insurance. Ditto for health care for now. In the future from the USA, not likely. How to shop around a heart transplant, cancer, etc. ? Here is one source http://www.healthtoursindia.com/general-surgery-cost.htm, another source for costs and your choice of doctors, procedures http://www.healthoptionsworldwide.com/faq/ These choices for major procedures can be done now, no waiting, and at a fraction of USA costs. Ever wonder why so many doctors are foreign? They come here for the money, then return home to help their own people. By shopping procedures, we are just returning to doctors that are familar with USA patients. Blue Cross takes anyone, and does not deny insurance due to 'pre-existing' conditions. Just because you turn 45, does not mean you are prone to suffer from obese, high blood pressure , etc. unless by choice, and ignorance. Link me stats to prove otherwise. Tort reform? Reform means fixing and putting reasonable limits, not taking away any rights. Millions of $$ for 'hot coffee' is not reasonable. see link http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090828200024AA6HvbF Time to back up your opinions with links.
Frank Lee May 26, 2011 at 03:46 am
First off tort reform is big government becoming involved in the legal system. Tort reform has already been tried and it does not reduce costs because it is not a major cost driver in the health delivery system. Most victims of medical malpractice don't even sue and that Mc Donaldson coffee case is one case, it did not result in a final judgement for millions, and it has nothing to do with health care. Your option health tours to India. That is the most bizarre, stupid, and worthless piece of garbage ever to come out of a teabaggers mouth. You are not even worth talking to. You have no concept of how a market operates, supply demand curves, monetary,policy or basic taxation levels. You are simply an ignorant resentful hillbilly troll. I will not even entertain the fact that you think high blood pressure is always choice.
Frank Lee May 26, 2011 at 04:11 am
8. A comprehensive study released in 2006 by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health entitled, “Claims, Errors and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation,” New England Journal of Medicine, May 11, 2006, provides empiric data to debunk myths of a medical community burdened by frivolous claims or a legal system paying compensation to unworthy victims. The major conclusions reached by a panel of physicians who reviewed some 1,500 case files from five liability insurance carriers were as follows:
Does this count or is Harvard School of Public Health socialist what about that liberal bastion The new England Journal of Medicine
Lee Jacobsen May 26, 2011 at 04:51 am
Starting with your last comment, choice does play a great factor in high blood pressure. Unlike you, I tend to back up my opinions with links. Try this...http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/heartdisease/risk/092.html
Notice all the 'choices' available to one who wants to choose normal blood pressure? All the things to avoid? Regarding concepts, what do you do or have learned to make you an expert on how a market operates, supply and demand, monetary policy, taxation levels? Have you ever run a business? Employed anyone? Talk is cheap, what have you done to improve Dearborn? Have you bothered to review the proposed budget? How many council meetings have you attended?. (watching on TV does not count) All of these questions are probably bizarre, stupid, and worthless to you, since they involve commonsense. thought, and effort. Regarding Tort reform, why are insurance costs for doctors so high? Those high insurance premiums are paid by the patients in the form of higher costs. Often, a doctor would rather retire than pay the premiums, often in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Lawyers despise tort reform as it hits them in the pocket book. Most politicians are lawyers. Can there be a conflict of interest? Does the govt waste money? Come on...open your eyes! Reform means change, not elimination of the tort system. read here http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/pf/20050727a1.asp Bottom line is less cost and more choice.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dearborn Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Tom B June 18, 2013 at 07:42 pm
Way too much for a college having financial problems.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Here is a copy of the terms of service. http://dearborn.patch.com/terms We will not tolerateRead More readers posting with curse words or attacking other readers. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice week. If you require further clarification, you are welcome to email me.
Gary Woronchak June 12, 2013 at 10:32 am
Hasn't even worked one day? Not one day in 15 years? Really? Not even credit for one day? When IRead More worked at the Press & Guide (which eliminated my position in a budget restructuring that has continued under various corporate owners at the P&G for a decade and a half, resulting in them moving their offices to Southgate and more recently just out-and-out eliminating their editor, sports editor and photographer) we had a policy of no anonymous letters to the editor. This was done because, while everyone has the right to express their opinion, putting a real name with an opinion meant people displayed more decorum and, well, less cowardice than is allowed in online comments from the shadows. Joseph, the benefit of post-employment health care after just eight years of service may have, in the early 1990s, been more acceptable in some way I can't figure (retention of key department heads has been cited as a reason, as was that it apparently mirrored a benefit for state officials), but it clearly was part of the excesses of Wayne County that was unjustifiable and unsustainable in the 2000s. This practice was ended two years ago by a resolution I introduced.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:22 am
The original comment has been deleted because it violates our terms of service.
Joseph Borrajo June 13, 2013 at 10:08 am
Thank you Gary Woroncahk for the response.
laplateau June 11, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yeah, unless the drinking trough is filled with taxpayer water.
laplateau June 10, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Joseph, Are you bordering upon slander? Is this the reason for no more info? I hope you are not.Read More Perhaps you are picking up on some nasty rumors and repeating them here. You should know better than to do that. So, if you have real proof, tell it like it is and don't hedge. What you are saying in your post is dangerous to you and those who you are referring to, so, as the saying goes...put up or shut up.
Judith Lundy June 10, 2013 at 05:56 pm
Whether or not the facts of this opinion piece are true, I thoroughly believe Robert McNamara wasRead More the personal trainer for Kwame Kilpatrick. McNamera would have been spending a lot of time in prison if he didn't die. Ficano is a joke in my estimation. I know no one who wants him to remain in office. With today's survellience techniques and high tech gadgets, politicians can no longer get away with what they did in the past.
Joseph Borrajo June 10, 2013 at 10:19 pm
Follow the money!