.
Feedback

Debate Party Attendees: Talk Lacked Moderation, Obama 'A Disappointment'

Viewers of the first presidential debate at Patch's watch party in Dearborn had plenty to say about the candidates' positions, and their personalities during the televised event.

Though the viewership at the presidential debate watch party hosted by Patch in Dearborn skewed in favor of President Barack Obama, attendees said that overall, they thought Republican candidate Mitt Romney took home the win Wednesday night.

"I was disappointed in Obama," said Dearborn resident Fran Hayes after the debate party, held at the Good Times Caffe. "I wanted him to show more passion."

Detroit resident Johnna McConico added that she was surprised by Romney's debating abilities against the president.

"I didn't think he would be that strong, but he stood his ground," she said. "I think as we were caught off guard by Romney being assured, (Obama) probably was, too."

As a result, viewers in Dearborn felt Obama didn't seize the opportunity to tout his successes while in office. Instead, viewers agreed, he spent too much time defending himself.

"Romney did more attacking," Dearborn resident Joe commented, "but Obama has more of a track record. Obama should have been more aggressive in pointing out his accomplishments."

Some, however, felt that both candidates would have benefited from heavier moderation to keep them on topic—and to their allotted times.

"Jim Lehrer ruined it," said Dearborn resident Kathy Porach of the former PBS director. "He brought no spark."

Commenters on Twitter and in social media outlets seemed to agree, with USA Today suggesting that Lehrer "lost control."

"Apparently, Jim Lehrer thinks the best moderator is no moderator at all," the national media source reported.

Consequentially, Dearborn debate viewers said there were more issues they felt should have been addressed. Among them were education, the auto bailout, and women's issues.

"There was no mention of women's health care," commented Dearborn resident Christina Do. "I thought that was a huge oversight."

What did you think of the debate? Tell us in the comments what the good and bad points were, then take our Patch Poll and tell us who won.

Lee Jacobsen October 4, 2012 at 03:06 pm
resident Joe nailed it, Obama should have been more agressive in his accomplishments. Oops! What accomplishments? Record unemployment, record spending, our citizens in the Middle East murdered?
All Romney had to do was show up, the win for him was a 'given'. The topic of Energy was telling. The 90 billion spent on 'losers' in wind and solar was a telling point, one of many. I mention it as I almost got zapped by Solyndra, and the Volt is another govt loser. Romney pointing out that all increases in oil production was accomplished by the private sector, not the govt, was also revealing. The next catch word, 'trickle down government'. The moderator was great, letting the two slug it out, rather than cutting them off mid-sentence. The next format will be 'town hall', any chance one of us can get in and ask a question?
Joseph Robert October 6, 2012 at 01:07 am
Read about all of the more than 20 false statements and lies that Romney told at the debate.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/?mobile=nc How can anyone trust this extremist who will say ANYTHING to get elected!
Lee Jacobsen October 6, 2012 at 03:46 am
Joseph, are you kidding? Obama promised us all transparency in govt, reach across the aisle, more jobs, etc, instead he has done none of those promises, plus, lowered our status in the world, doubled gas prices, gave us not only one, but two downgrades in country credit ratings, the first ever by the way, due to his record spending, we all know Obama's record, and it isn't pretty. The real Obama was at the debate, he can't think but in short 'thought bites' , and without teleprompters , script writers, and an audience that cheers at appropriate moments to give him time to think, he looked and performed 'poorly'. His handlers were aware of his shortcomings even before the debate, and were downplaying their expectations accordingly. Now the Dems call Romney a liar. Are we back in the 5th grade again? Calling Romney a liar because he didn't follow the Dem's playbook?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dearborn Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carla O'Neill June 19, 2013 at 03:39 pm
Wasn't a major portion of the deficit a result of the failure of students to repay $$$millions inRead More student loans? There is a rumor that HFCC wants to forgive those loans and pass on the debt to Dearborn taxpayers. Was there due diligence regarding the awarding of these loans?
Tom B June 18, 2013 at 07:42 pm
Way too much for a college having financial problems.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Here is a copy of the terms of service. http://dearborn.patch.com/terms We will not tolerateRead More readers posting with curse words or attacking other readers. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice week. If you require further clarification, you are welcome to email me.
Gary Woronchak June 12, 2013 at 10:32 am
Hasn't even worked one day? Not one day in 15 years? Really? Not even credit for one day? When IRead More worked at the Press & Guide (which eliminated my position in a budget restructuring that has continued under various corporate owners at the P&G for a decade and a half, resulting in them moving their offices to Southgate and more recently just out-and-out eliminating their editor, sports editor and photographer) we had a policy of no anonymous letters to the editor. This was done because, while everyone has the right to express their opinion, putting a real name with an opinion meant people displayed more decorum and, well, less cowardice than is allowed in online comments from the shadows. Joseph, the benefit of post-employment health care after just eight years of service may have, in the early 1990s, been more acceptable in some way I can't figure (retention of key department heads has been cited as a reason, as was that it apparently mirrored a benefit for state officials), but it clearly was part of the excesses of Wayne County that was unjustifiable and unsustainable in the 2000s. This practice was ended two years ago by a resolution I introduced.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:22 am
The original comment has been deleted because it violates our terms of service.
Joseph Borrajo June 13, 2013 at 10:08 am
Thank you Gary Woroncahk for the response.
laplateau June 11, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yeah, unless the drinking trough is filled with taxpayer water.