.
Feedback

Dearborn to Step Up Nuisance Vehicle Code Enforcement Starting Nov. 1

Dearborn residents with qualifying cars at their homes are encouraged to have them removed or stored to avoid fines.

Starting Nov. 1, Dearborn police will step up enforcement of codes against nuisance vehicles stored on private property to preserve the quality of neighborhoods and remove safety hazards.

To avoid a $500 fine, police are encouraging residents who have a title to an unwanted vehicle to take advantage of the city’s amnesty program by calling Rusko’s Towing at 313-274-4550. The unwanted vehicle will be towed away without cost.

Residents who want to keep their vehicles are encouraged to move any that meet the definition of a nuisance into storage inside an enclosed structure. This includes vehicles that are disassembled, stripped, dismantled, can’t be driven or are in a state of disrepair.

Vehicles found to be inoperative for any reason could be in violation of the nuisance ordinance, known as City Ordinance 13-2. This applies to property owners who store, or allow to be stored, a nuisance vehicle.

After Nov. 1, vehicles found to be in violation of the nuisance ordinance will be tagged by the . Residents will have 72 hours to remove or properly store the vehicle. After that, the homeowner may be responsible for towing/storage and a misdemeanor violation punishable by a fine up to $500.

“When you’re finished working on your car, push it back in the garage,” said police Cpl. Mike Nelson. “Leaving them out is neighborhood blight.”

Nuisance vehicles also can be dangerous, according to police. They often have broken glass, sharp metal protrusions or are mounted on blocks or jacks that might become unstable.

Because they frequently block access for fire equipment to adjacent buildings and structures, nuisance vehicles also constitute a fire hazard.

They can serve as a breeding ground for insects and rodents.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dearborn Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Linda Scharf Brazier October 23, 2011 at 02:37 pm
Love it I call on my neighbors all the time on these issues including no boats and Campers.......
Lee Jacobsen October 23, 2011 at 07:22 pm
If the vehicle has a current plate and is stored 'temporarily' , then no violation, right?
By temporary, it is moved at least every 3 days. Anyone know for sure?
Jessica Carreras (Editor) October 23, 2011 at 11:32 pm
In my understanding, Lee, it depends more on the state of the vehicle - I would think that the car you speak of is not in violation. But I would refer to the Code of Ordinances chapter on "Nuisances." You can access it here - it's chapter 13: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=12465&stateID=22&statename=Michigan
K. Lane October 24, 2011 at 12:06 am
Sell it for scrap metal - the cost of towing and scrap - you may get up to $300.00's from the towing company.
Lee Jacobsen October 24, 2011 at 12:29 am
Jessica, the link did not work. This one might....
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=12465&stateID=22&statename=Michigan Also, in browsing the codes, (so many rules to break!! ) did not see any rules about storing boats or trailers, or large motor homes. I suppose if it offends the senses then it qualifies. That means you better get a real nice motor home and loan it out to all the neighbors so they are 'happy'. Apparently, these violations are triggered by homeowner complaints, and not roving officers looking for 'issues'.
Ward James Brazier October 24, 2011 at 06:57 am
hey Lee you do not have to be a neighbor to complain ............trust me on this ......been to many council meetings on these issues .......and it does not state a direct neighbor on Ordinance.......
cheryl October 24, 2011 at 11:58 am
I believe you have a small window of time to have your boat or motor home on the property. 3 days rings a bell. And be aware when a house goes up for sale in the near vicinity of your home...real estate agents call the city about this stuff all the time.
cheryl October 25, 2011 at 01:15 am
Where in the Municode does it say that I can't have a boat or camper on my property? I only see info on public property.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carla O'Neill June 19, 2013 at 03:39 pm
Wasn't a major portion of the deficit a result of the failure of students to repay $$$millions inRead More student loans? There is a rumor that HFCC wants to forgive those loans and pass on the debt to Dearborn taxpayers. Was there due diligence regarding the awarding of these loans?
Tom B June 18, 2013 at 07:42 pm
Way too much for a college having financial problems.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Here is a copy of the terms of service. http://dearborn.patch.com/terms We will not tolerateRead More readers posting with curse words or attacking other readers. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice week. If you require further clarification, you are welcome to email me.
Gary Woronchak June 12, 2013 at 10:32 am
Hasn't even worked one day? Not one day in 15 years? Really? Not even credit for one day? When IRead More worked at the Press & Guide (which eliminated my position in a budget restructuring that has continued under various corporate owners at the P&G for a decade and a half, resulting in them moving their offices to Southgate and more recently just out-and-out eliminating their editor, sports editor and photographer) we had a policy of no anonymous letters to the editor. This was done because, while everyone has the right to express their opinion, putting a real name with an opinion meant people displayed more decorum and, well, less cowardice than is allowed in online comments from the shadows. Joseph, the benefit of post-employment health care after just eight years of service may have, in the early 1990s, been more acceptable in some way I can't figure (retention of key department heads has been cited as a reason, as was that it apparently mirrored a benefit for state officials), but it clearly was part of the excesses of Wayne County that was unjustifiable and unsustainable in the 2000s. This practice was ended two years ago by a resolution I introduced.
Daniel Lai (Editor) June 12, 2013 at 11:22 am
The original comment has been deleted because it violates our terms of service.
Joseph Borrajo June 13, 2013 at 10:08 am
Thank you Gary Woroncahk for the response.
laplateau June 11, 2013 at 11:28 am
Yeah, unless the drinking trough is filled with taxpayer water.