The Speech he SHOULD give...
Twelve years after we began our war against those who so brutally attacked our country on 9/11. I am here to specifically say to you that our armed services have done your job and you have done your job well. The State of our Union is currently framed fighting two ground wars and restructuring our financial system.
As the Commander and Chief I am expected to lead and a leader must make decisions that will take into account all available knowledge and rationality.
As your Commander-in-Chief I am announcing the immediate withdrawal of all troops from the Mid-east Theater of operations effective immediately. We urge our allies to do the same.
After careful analysis and intensive debate from within and without my administration the decision as to how to proceed in this war is on my shoulders. I take that responsibility and now I give you my rationales and how we will deal with these countries and these threats in the future.
A country must determine with careful consideration what its primary and secondary interests are. Failure to determine these priorities leads to poor allocation of important national assets and most importantly how and when to enter into war and when it is necessary to put in harm’s way those men and women of our armed services who are obligated to enforce all lawful and just actions of our country.
We entered Iraq under a stated analysis from the Executive Branch of our government that was based upon totally false and misleading information. It was a mistake to have attacked Iraq and it is a mistake to stay there. Iraq has duplicity in this regard; they could have at any time opened up their country to total inspection and disproved these false allegations. They did not and share in
the responsibility of the aftermath. We offer no apology but we will now correct that mistake and leave.
The stated rationale for our incursion into Afghanistan was to attack the bases from which we were attacked on 9/11 and to arrest those responsible. I have determined that “nation-building” by the United States in Afghanistan is not in our primary interest and therefore order all our military to exit that theater as soon as
possible in a manner that will protect our troops.
One of the primary strengths of our country is our ability defend ourselves. That takes money and capital. To squander that asset in wars that are not in our primary interest is to damage our national security, not improve it, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have done exactly that over the past eight years. I am going to immediately end the squander of $100 billion/year in this region. Additionally, effective immediately, the United States will end its foreign aid commitments to both Israel and Egypt by 50% over the next three years and to zero after that period. We are ending our troop involvement in South Korea, Okinawa and Germany.
In regard to war and our ability to wage it we have two primary advantages: 1. Our technology and, 2. Our asset base of capital and highly educated people.
In future conflicts we will use those assets to promote our primary interests. We warn any country that attempts to attack our primary interests that they will be met, not with troops on the ground as they would like, but with a technology that will give them great pause and with collateral damage that will be on the shoulders of those who do not now heed my warning. I warn in no uncertain terms that those who use this reduction in troop exposure will not mean that they are immune to the sting of the United States. I am certain that we will be tested in this regard and we are ready for that test.
Additionally, I am removing all U.S. troops from Europe, Okinawa and South Korea.
These measures will attempt to bring our fiscal house in order. Finally, in regard to heath care, I am urging the Congress to continue to advance the taxing of those with high incomes but at the same time to impose a 3% Federal Health Sales Tax on all purchases up to $1,000 so that every legal person in our country is afforded adequate health care and has an awareness of its costs. If we are successful in squeezing out efficiencies and these taxes are not needed then I am sure Congress will find a way to reduce or eliminate them. But the time of the great “handout” is over. We are going to run a balanced budget. We are gong to pay for things we want up-front, as we go. Our kids and grandkids will not carry our wasteful burden. We are going to put the Social Security system in the black and we are going to eliminate all Federal debt.
In regard to immigration I am going to urge only if the Federal Health Tax is approved a complete end to immigration into the United States for a period of 50 years and that those attempting to enter the country illegally may be dealt with by deadly force at our borders.
In so doing, our defense capability will be the strongest in the world, the most flexible and if needed, the most feared and respected.
I anticipate that the county will intensely debate these new proclamations that I have made here today. Many will disagree. It is the way. But I am the leader of this country; I was elected to guide us for these four years or perhaps longer and
the people have a right to see their leader use circumspection and rationality. I do this because I think it is right.
Axxel Knutson
there are congress and others say there is enough, take care of the abuse in the heath care system, that are soaking the public, and the system, every one that is getting medical help will see, what I am talking about....... there are so many different price structures out there. one small example, my medicine......... 90 day supply, 6 different heart and diabetes, = all the way from 800 + if you have insurance, sent to the insurance, and locally at sams walmart rite aid, cvs, Kroger was the cheapest untill they adjusted their price on one drug, etc...... I have quotes of 195 down to 95.00 for generic .......... sams and walmart are the same basically, so why such a big difference....... buyer be where. Rite aid surprising is the cheapest so far.... at 95.00 ......... why are the insurance co's charged so much more? when foot traffic can get it 90% cheaper or so...........
It's alright to have some uneducated immigrants come in to work the fields and clean hotel rooms. As long as they are working to achieve the American dream for themselves and their children.
Cut the DoD by 60%? That's crazy. Way too much. There's no reason to tax gas guzzlers. The free market is already doing the job. How about nat gas for transportation. We have too much of it already. No need for more taxes. The only problem with social security is the government does not want to honor the benefits of generation X. There is a file cabinet in the Social Security Administration offices that is literal filled with I.O.U.s from our general fund. The recipients of today stood idly by while President Johnson started that trend. You want to fix it? Start your cuts with the current recipients.
What do you mean when you state that our legislators are exempted from Obamacare? Do they not have to abide by the individual mandate? What aspect of Obamacare applies to you and me that does not apply to a member of Congress? I hope you will answer my question, as I ask in earnest.
Wind turbines are losing their luster. This site gives the realities. http://windfarmrealities.org/ The claims are sort of like global warming proponents. Lots of reasons why wind turbines are wonderful, but the evidence does not add up, not even close. Ever see a wind turbine farm? Most are never running. Most are designed to run at wind speeds of between 7 and 15 mph. Otherwise, to slow, or too fast. Farmers hate them. A constant 'whish....whish....whissh.....whissh....would drive anyone nuts. Let's switch to tidal turbines. Easier to look at. See more here. http://www.pressherald.com/news/ORPC-turbine-off-Eastport-is-the-first-to-do-so-in-North-America.html Maine has the first one working in the USA. No noise , and water cooled.
And if health care coverage were paid for through a national tax, how much would you save by not having to provide it separately, and less efficiently, for your workers and yourself?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/25/8-ridiculous-tax-loopholes-how-companies-are-avoiding-the-tax-man.html Larry, the govt is my unwelcome silent partner in business that takes no risk, brings nothing to the table except red tape, takes a large share of any profit, and yes, I made my business, not the govt. I educated my workforce to make my product, my taxes paid for the roads, arm and protect myself, and pay the bills without govt loans. My taxes pay the bills for police and fire, and i collect my own bills my way. i pay the high corporate rate, not rich enough to hire lobbyists like the unions to get loopholes. Heath care savings? Are you kidding? Most small companies have given up providing healthcare long ago, choosing to survive rather than provide benefits and go out of business. Who pays for the so-called healthcare tax? We do. Finally, private companies actually have to work within a budget, unlike our govt. who spends money like it is water. Bartering is actually a decent option, no money changing hands, and no taxes as a result.
http://troy.patch.com/blog_posts/a-guide-to-ballot-proposals-proposal-3 Indiana farmers earn $5-7K per year from the wind turbines on their land. Some don’t like the farm scenery spoiled, though. Some in Troy, Michigan like the city ordinance we have against billboards along I-75, when the extra revenue from a few billboards could help the city. Most of those people probably voted for Prop 3. Government control, as long as it controls someone else. Everything’s a tradeoff. I object when innocent human life is traded for my tax dollars, however, and I’m told I should be quiet and do it for the common good. http://troy.patch.com/blog_posts/freedom-of-conscience-the-foundational-freedom
Just to clarify, there is no Troy ordinance against billboards along I-75. Do you have information about the dollars Troy would actually get in revenue (taxes) for billboards along I-75?
I went to G R last week , I see local owner, backed up old Hay wagon, and very old rusted out 1940's (?) trucks and built an "A" or Mansard frame around the vehicle, (dropped the frame on the vehicle, (could be lifted off) with a sign, this space for rent it was very close to the right away, I am sure M-dot is too busy to deal with that, the owner was def. going on his own, and by passing the usual sign co. paid commission. As for the wind energy's, all for them, Europe has them all over and has a very small issue with oil prices...... So. & No Dakota will be all but fossil fuel free very shortly, ( I know they have smaller pop. but still are pro active of getting off the dependency of coal etc.
I'll take that to mean you have no answer, and your statement is nothing but non-sense. What a shame, since I've heard so many people repeat that non-sense.
According to Obamacare, the legislators must buy from the exchanges just like all of us. Of course, they can afford the better plans from the exchanges , but , if the law is actually followed, then we should all have equal access. In other areas of govt, this is not true. Politicians always have themselves covered. Details are here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_United_States We are writing 3000 pages of new laws per day. The income tax law that we all must follow when filing our 1040 returns totals over 3 million words , longer than the bible. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/09/u-s-tax-code-longer-than-the-bible-without-good-news/ Time to simplfy the govt and get rid of red tape. Start with a budget and less spending.
I was not going to dispute that members of Congress may have exempted themselves from some laws, but this whole "Congressmen don't have to follow Obamacare" lie has been used as an attack on Obamacare, not Congress. And that is the lie I was hoping to get clarification about. Thank you for responding.