patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Conversation Reopened on Moving Dearborn's Arab International Festival

The City of Dearborn suggested that festival officials are discussing refreshing the annual event.

 

The idea of moving one of Dearborn's iconic events to a different location is again a topic of discussion amongst city officials.

Mayor Jack O'Reilly said Tuesday that talks would begin soon about moving the Arab International Festival from its usual spot on Warren Avenue.

"We offered this the last couple of years, and they were adamant about staying," O'Reilly said of festival organizers, led by the American Arab Chamber of Commerce.

However, O'Reilly shared that changes on the organization's Executive Board also meant a change in popular opinion on the subject of moving the festival.

Support for moving the festival centers around the fact that hosting the event at a closed site would protect the city from liability concerning protestors.

A Christian evangelist was kicked out of the festival by police in 2009. The man, Sudanese Christian Pastor George Saieg, later sued the city for violating his free speech rights by not allowing him to speak on public sidewalks and won.

If the festival was held at a closed site with set entrances, organizers could preclude anyone but festival attendees from entering.

“Dearborn fully supports the festival,” O’Reilly said in 2012. “It’s the location that is the issue.”

Festival organizers, however, have shared that hosting the event on Warren Avenue is important to the festival's goal of supporting local businesses along that strip.

In 2012, it was decided that if Wayne County would indemnify the city, thus taking full responsibility for primary security at the event, that the city would approve it.

However, O'Reilly said the conversation will be renewed this year as the AACC looks to possibly revamp the festival.

"This is a good time in this dialogue to refresh the goal of it," he said.

City Councilwoman Nancy Hubbard suggested Tuesday that the site should be located at Ford Woods Park—a move that has been supported by city officials in the past, as well.

Related Topics: American Arab Chamber of Commerce, Arab International Festival, and City of Dearborn

Jim

8:49 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Leave the festival on Warren where it belongs and is able to support the local business area.

Reply

bitsy08

8:56 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Well, Jim, if it opens up the city for lawsuits, then it's pretty selfish to hold it on Warren. One more point. Let's hope that signs for this event are put in APPROVED placed around the city and in Dearborn Heights. I'm pretty tired of people posting their signs on public property, which in DH, is against the law.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

12:56 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The city will be vulnerable for lawsuits no matter where the festival is held if on city property of any kind. That "lawsuit" argument is baloney, a red herring at best. "Selfish" to hold it on Warren...you're calling the people who revitalized Warren Ave and prevented it from becoming a western edge of Warren & 23rd street selfish? I live immediately adjacent to the festival and it has never bothered my Irish Christian, life long Detroiter, 30 years in east Dearborn, self one bit. The Mayor might want to tell us more about the new city hall they've bought and how they're going to operate it for $7.50 per square foot as he clamed/claims...never miond not having a tenant for the old city hall yet.

The Truth Hurts

9:24 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I personally think it would be a great idea to move it. That way we can keep the protesters out. For many years my family has enjoyed walkig up to the festival however it has gotten bad. My children don't even want to attend any more. Last year there was a man with a pigs head on a stick that told my son he would go to hell for following the Muslim religion. First of all he doesn't know what religion my son follows and secondly how horrific is that for a child just seeking some summer fun at a festival. Regarding supporting the businesses. If the festival organization offered a more reasonable price to rent space the businesses would be able to travel to the park and set up shop there. Just my opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

12:56 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Personally, from an immedaitely adjacent perspective, I'd prefer the Dearborn Police Department and/or the Wayne County Sheriff to actually police the festival and kick out those who are intentionally disrupting an ethnic festival whih includes more than just Muslims. I am damn tired of having to back away from rowdy protestors who exercise far more than their 1st Amendment rights, for political reasons, and usually from out of the state of Michigan to boot. WE have law enforcement, let us have them enforcew the law old school.

Donna Hay

12:55 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I have no problem with the festival being held on Warren Ave. But if the city is against this why do they issue permits?

Reply

Marium Wilke

12:54 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I know my organizations have it at their place of worship..I think it would be very suitable for all the needs if their festival would be on their Mosque property...This way the city is not liable for anything occurring issues.. And they can allow who they want to participate In their festival....They have a huge property lot and parking..Easy to get into and out of..And more visable for more people to stop and enjoy their. festival

Reply
Comment_arrow

laplateau

1:03 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Marium...great idea! I forgot about the mosque location. It is an easy in/easy pout with lots of parking.

Comment_arrow

Aridog

1:06 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Two problems with the Mosque use idea: A.) the festival is NOT a "Muslim Festival" it IS an "Arabic Festival" which includes both main types of Islam, as well as Christianity. B.) The large Mosque you refer to is a shiite Mosque, and not all local Arabs are Shiite...many are Sunni, and some are Christian, Marionite or Chaldean. By viewing this as a mono-cultural Islamic event, we risk creating the same "separate but equal Jim Crow" environment that the British and French are enduring the results of today. Forcve isolation and we quickly eliminate assimilation, all the while complaining about the lack of whihc we prevented. I mean no offense, but this all Muslim concept of the festival is counter productive....and it literally "inviotes" the trouble makers , such as dingbat Terry Jones from Florida.

laplateau

1:00 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Ford Woods Park could work, except the parking would be a problem. I really don't believe there is enough of that to contain the large turn outs. And, what would prevent any protesters from going there as well? It is public property as is Warren Ave. I don't see how any of the city's public parks could be contrsued as a "closed site" . I am not sure what the mayor defines as a closed site...and the statement..."If the festival was held at a closed site with set entrances, organizers could preclude anyone but festival attendees from entering."...certainly doesn't sound like anything that would be public property.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

1:22 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I mean no offense to anyone on this board, but I'm getting very tired of a city executive administration that finds itself in a self-made hole and keeps digging. The Mayor needs to focus on current problems to remedy and not a social issue that has been discuissed twice and rejected by the proponents. Why go for three? Reminds me fo the great super-duper advantages the paid or for fee parking would be for West Dearborn...oh, wait.....a project implemented without a market base (apartments and condos never built), now I wonder why that worked out poorly. Letting people have festival in a neighborhood is assimilative and rewards the very people who built and/or restored the neighborhood. Shoving them onto a church/mosque property is the opposite and fosters the problems we seek to avoid. It is certainly worth discussing on "Patch" but it is nonsense to revisit by the city administration. As I imp;led earlier here, I don't even want to hear about "costs" until someone in the city can explain to me the $7.50 per square foot annual O&M costs of the new city hall, and how it miraculously doens't increase as the pruchase price is amortized, as every other building does, in nearly linear fashion. Also how a claimed O&M savings on one structure is not offset by the purchase and O&M of another structure as if the "saved money" isn't spent anyway....actually more spent in moving infrastructure. Fix all that and then maybe get back to the festival.

Bob

2:14 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The article states, "If the festival was held at a closed site with set entrances, organizers could preclude anyone but festival attendees from entering."

Can someone please explain to me how moving it keeps protesters out? They could still protest at that site even if they weren't allowed inside the festival area and I would assume the City would still be responsible if anything happened since it would still be on City property.

What am I missing? How is moving it going to stop the protesters?

Reply

laplateau

3:05 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

What is it about the Muslim (meaning one who practices Islam) that prohibits the mingling between Sunni and Shiites...or with Christians and the aforementioned denominations either? Airdog, you seem to be saying that diversity is fine unless it come to Muslims of different sects. How does that figure with how they react with one another or with anyone else that is not of their particular sect. Is there really such intolerance among Muslims? The Christian faith has outreach programs and interacts between the various denominations (ecumentalism)...Presbyterians, Methodists, Catholics, etc, etc. Do you really think that only Sunni or Shite Muslims attend the festival now...along with a myriad of other people of other faiths? Maybe I just don't understand your point here, but I have no idea of your connection of the separate but equal concept you are referring to. It seems that just the opposite is true in encouraging people of all faiths to come together. Maybe the Mosque isn't the right idea, but I hate to go away with the idea that the various sects of Islam can’t mingle. Oh, by the way, I don't believe it should be referred to as an "Arabic" festival either. Arabic refers to a language, not a country of origin, race, religion, type of food, Sunnism, etc. If anything, I would love them to call it an Arab-American festival...that sure sounds a lot more inclusive!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

4:56 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Nothing prohibits mingling now, and the festival along Warren Ave is the best place for it. The Warren ave. location leaves the "all faiths or not" question totally out of it. The entire problem in festivals past has been precisely that some people, Christian heretics in my opinion, insist on placing a religious face on it. I did NOT allege intolerance between Muslims or Arabs as an ethnic groups per se (although to say there is none is nonsense)...I did infer that forcing them to utilize one particular Mosque was divisive....if for no other reason than they do NOT choose to do so. Relocation has been put up twice and rejected twice. The public liabilitry bit is a typical politicians dodge...and total baloney if the location remains public, property. I did NOT say various sects can't mingle, that is YOUR impression that you are projecting. As for the "separate but equal" part...very simply, that IS when a group is told they may gather over there, just not here. As for your determination on what "Arab" is or is not, I suggest you study cultural anthropology a bit more. Never mind you trying to tell Arabs what to call themselves...who do you think named the festival, I would be happy if they called it the Arab-American festival but that's not going to happen until the majority feel like Americans....not special cases to be herded off to the side in some church.

AndreaVH

5:24 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I support the move too. I just live one block off of Warren and I didn't go to the festival last year because I was disillusioned with the festival from 2011, with all the protesters and yelling back and forth (profanities). I want to go and have fun...not listen to a loud bullhorn denouncing another religion. If it stays on Warren this year, I decided I'm not going, and might even leave town to do something else that weekend.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

3:04 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Once upon a time "<i>...all the protesters and yelling back and forth (profanities). I want to go and have fun...not listen to a loud bullhorn ...</i>" would have be called "disturbing the peace" and been stopped, then charged as a misdemeanor. Instead of being discouraged by the imposition of outsiders on fellow residents, we should be outraged that it happens at all and support all activities to suppress the rudeness by interlopers with nothing but their own self interest in mind. We citizens of Dearborn, east and west, need to support law enforcement, and among other things, elect judges who will find in favor of the residnets here.

Jim Hype

7:53 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The festival has been sort of a tradition, after all these years. Leave it on Warren Ave. The Big Guy (O'Reilley) just can't leave well enough alone.

Reply

Mirna D

10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Ever since I came to the states the Arabic festival was on warren avenue. It won't sound original and true if you take a historic festival spot that have been celebrated on Warren road for many years elsewhere. It will take out the magic of the Arabic festival. It's a legendary spot!

Reply

laplateau

7:58 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

What happened to all the other posts that were here yesterday???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

9:20 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

It appears that for the last day or so you have to re-sign in on Patch, before you can view a thread then click on comments and get all of them. It happens every time I try to open patch from the email notification.

laplateau

8:14 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Airdog...you say above " I did NOT say various sects can't mingle, that is YOUR impression that you are projecting." It seems quite the opposite when you previously said "it IS an "Arabic Festival" which includes both main types of Islam, as well as Christianity. B.) The large Mosque you refer to is a Shiite Mosque, and not all local Arabs are Shiite...many are Sunni" certainly sounds as if you feel they are exclusive and in no way inclusive. Maybe I still don't quite understand your point, but, whatever. In any case, I don't see why a substantial part of a public thoroughfare, not even a Dearborn owned street, should be shut down for a particular festival for several days...taking away the right of way to the taxpayers of Wayne County. If it were for a few hours I could understand and agree, but several days? It could be held at Hemlock Park, just a few blocks south of Warren Ave....or Ford Woods...or even Ford Field. Truly the latter would be the best site because it is our largest public park with the most parking and the most separated from heavily congested residential areas as any other site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

9:58 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

No, I am pretty sure you do not get my point, which is really two parts. That's a good thing...it implies I am not being clear. The first is admittedly political because it serves no socially and politically constructive purpose to suggest herding the festival goers off to the large Shiite Mosque. I have not doubt the Shiite Mosque on Ford Road would be very inviting to any and all visitors, but that is not the point. One of the problems the majority of the Arab Muslims in our community face is the projection upon them that they must be associated with terrorist fanatics and are presumptively Muslim which is promptly conflated as the same thing. What do you think draws wack-job Terry Jones, purported evangelical Christian preacher (mail order ordination?), to Dearborn? Who is next, Fred Phelps, or a return of the Apologetics 17 {sic?] hypocrites? None of these "protesters" are from anywhere near local. Somehow the Jehovah's Witness "missionaries" manage to appear in the Warren-Schaefer area, two or more times per year on random days, without bull horns, yelling, or provocative intrusive behavior...downright old school courteous in fact. "Free Speech" seems to be interpreted as loud and intrusive these days, in other words, behavior that is out of the realm of customary and ordinary...e.g., disturbing the peace as a tactic. That used to be enforced as a misdemeanor crime.

Comment_arrow

Aridog

10:11 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

The second part of my position is simple enough: Many Americans complain that some immigrant groups do not "assimilate" and yet they insist on the equity of separation because of this perceived failure to assimilate. This is a conundrum, and an inadvertent thought process that leads to a "separate but equal" stances. My background is military, among other things, and I've been the minority in places I have lived. I've refused to serve in places that herd me into enclaves, such as Saudi Arabia back in the very early 1990's. It is offensive and demeaning. I've also assimilated enough in some very foreign nations to be unnoticed when speaking or walking in to a room, and yet remained very "American" and the point was to be a good example. For those who would relocate the festival to a public park, fair enough, but they need to examine their motives for civic interest versus personal interest....and skip the red herring point about a change in liability...then, and only then, is it a worthwhile topic for discussion and consensus. My point here is that there is no need to "fix" what isn't broken. There is no major impediment or lack of detours around the Warren Ave site, and the disturbance issues should be remedied by our law enforcement. Being sued is part of law enforcement and when it happens, the litigation defense is in defense of all of us ....unless you consider bull horn blaring protesters, without permits, in your front yard okay. I don't. And they are.

laplateau

9:27 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Airdog, yes, you are correct. I just discovered that myself.

Reply

laplateau

10:45 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Airdog...I definitely have a problem with those that come to this country and do not assimilate and instead simply make demands that we, individuals, institutions, and government agencies adapt to them. Religious freedom is certainly a right to all that are here. But if their ethnic or religious differences begin expect that we are required to assimilate or change to their way, I definitely draw the line. I do not "insist on the equity of separation because of this perceived failure to assimilate. ", but I do resist and totally disagree with bending to change our laws and court system to allow thing like Sharia Law. Our politicians foster these demands by yielding to them as a way of fostering more votes and falsely charading as their champion. I totally disagree with your opinion that our police department (meaning us as taxpayers) bend to allow the closing of a main thoroughfare. Just because many of the business on Warren Ave. happen to Arab or Middle Eastern owned does not give the right to demand we do so. I have lived in the east end for decades and I don't know anyone that I associate with that would equal Muslims to terrorists. However, we do have to admit that almost all the terrorist acts that have been committed in the last 10 years have been done by those who have openly decried that they have done so in the name of Islam. So, some of the more narrow mined folks among us do get that impression without knowing a single person that claims to be a Muslim. .

Reply

laplateau

10:55 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

And, liability is an issure here. There have been law suits initieated that the City of Dearborn has to a nswer to, regardless of how little merit anyhone might think the have. Anyone can sue anyone else for any reason. You still have to spend resources to defend against them. So, Airdog, I see a very apparent conflict when you say "disturbance issues should be remedied by our law enforcement. Being sued is part of law enforcement and when it happens", and then at the same time claim we have no liability issues. Two plus two ain't making four on this one.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

1:32 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

What I said was there is no difference in liability issues between Warren Ave., Ford Park, or the Shiite Mosque....not that there are no issues. All have the same issues IF the law is enforced. I don't know what the Dearborn insurance position is on the LEO conduct matter, but to argue that we can eliminate (that's others, not me) liability is just plain not true. In essense, it sounds like you are saying : we give up law enforcement, regardless of location, to avoid litigation by rent seekers? As for locations, public park, public street, both public and potential litigation sources...just as the Shiite Mosque is, even though private, it is entitled to law enforcement both on the property per se and on the approaches, which are public streets....just as you are in your home. Security and protection from disorderly conduct is part of the job of law enforcement. The liability decrease is nonsense. If anyone is arrested or prevented from disrupting a permitted activity in the city, on whatever property, they will sue to city. Now, just for the exercise, tell me just what exactly the Arab Festival does that is harmful to the public well being? Why do they not deserve the same privilege and protection you or I do in our homes or places of business?

The Truth Hurts

11:01 am on Thursday, February 7, 2013

@airdog I get your point and it makes perfect sense. You make a lot of good valid points :)

Reply

laplateau

2:21 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Airdog...please point out to me where I said, or even intimated, that the Arab Festival is harmful to the public wellbeing. I can't see anywhere that I did so, but only argue that blocking off several blocks of public thoroughfare is wrong. We certainly don't hold homecoming festivities by blocking off Michigan Avenue from Brady to Haigh Streets. The Memorial Day Parade only blocks Michigan Ave for a few hours. Why should the festival have special treatment? And, please tell me where I said, or intimated that Arabs do not deserve the same privilege and protections in their home or places of business? Are you reading a post from someone else here, or what? Please---are you grasping at straws here?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

3:27 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

I give up @laplateau ... you make the inference, again, in your question vis a vis blocking the avenue is "wrong"...no matter, apparently that it is legally permitted by permit from city hall. As for legal protections for Arabs and you or me, you clearly expressed concern about law enforcement actions that could engender law suits by rent seekers (an interrogatory closed with a question mark). You assume less liability for a public park or a mosque. The implication, therefore, is less law enforcement per se for everyone to avoid litigation. I think that is a bug not a feature for law enforcement. You apparently (see that is a supposition, not a statement of fact?) that just don't want the festival on Warren avenue, for various reasons, none of which has impacted the public welfare and furthermore is not against the law. We will never be on the same page politically or socially on this subject. I honestly don't believe you have any idea what I am talking about...yet I, too, have lived here in the east end for decades. How you can be so v-e-r-y right on the Train Station matters and so adverse on this subject befuddles me. Both are boondoggles stirred up by Mayor O'Reilly for reasons beyond my comprehension....perhaps it is a case of "Oh, look!!...SQUIRREL" to divert attention from the uber-boondoggle, the new city hall, sponsored by financial information and presumptions that are 100% horse apples plus very poor math....ignorance rules I guess.

laplateau

3:51 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Yes, Airdog, I do believe we will never totally agree on this issue. Sure, lots of things are legal by permit, but the city has stated reasons ( whether you feel they are valid or not) for not wanting that festival on Warren Ave. Yes, liability issues can arise in any of the other suggested sites, but for one I believe the reactions from mostly young teens regarding the others that are there promoting other views on religion or whatever, and exercising their 1st amendments rights, might be reason to relocate it off Warren Ave. Blocking that street for days, in my mind, is just wrong. Can you think of any other group that has ever asked for a main street to be blocked off for days for their particular function before? I haven't....not in 40+ years here. I do take offense that you set yourself up as the enlightened one here and that others are just ignorant. Maybe I am misreading you, but your finishing statements sure sounded like that. Let’s end this as debate friends. I enjoy the “back and forth” with you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Aridog

5:02 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

You certainly are misreading me...my last sentence is regarding the horse apples logic and fuzzy math put out by the Mayor's office vis a vis the new city hall, and it's all in the same sentence. And, yes, I do stand by my opinion that this city hall boondoggle is manure and ignorance personified. That doesn't make me "enlightened" it just means I passed 3rd grade math and have professional experience with large office structures and space costs. Vis a vis the new city hall boondoggle, we are either being lied to intentionally or they are plain ignorant and assume we all are around here. You should get my meaning easily, based upon your opinions on the train station boondoggle, you do understand a con game when you see it. .

Watcher

4:17 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Why do we have to close down a public street for an Arab festival? Would you advocate closing down Warren the next weekend for the Italian Festival? And the weekend after that for the Polish Festival? And the weekend after that for the African Festival? Why can't the Arab-American community in Dearborn just put up a tent at Homecoming like everybody else does, OR have it in a park? And who says the business owners on Warren Avenue LIKE having the festival there? I've never heard any prominent Warren Avenue business owner speak publicly about wanting to keep it on Warren Ave. In fact, the only organization that seems to want to keep it is the American Arab Chamber of Commerce. Hmmmm...Wonder why they'd want it so bad if the businesses they allegedly represent are mum on the subject??? Leave the street for cars and have the festival in the park. The park was made for things like this. The street was made for cars.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AC

5:29 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Much of the area surrounding Ford Field is closed off for homecoming. It makes it difficult and inconvenient for residents in th immediate area, however, it is only three days out of the year and we put up with it for h sake of the thousands who attend. Why can't this same tolerance be afforded to the Arabic Festival?

And to the individual referring to himself/herself as leplateau, this statement about all recent acts of terrorism are committed by Muslims- you are just plain ignorant. First off define 'terrorism' then apply it properly. And next time you want to make this argument, the Zionist talking points instruct you to say, "not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslim."

Comment_arrow

Freedom Of Others Thoughts

2:10 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

AC your a Joke . WTF man really Your so behind the times . Here let me say this your a asshole, People like you are the reason people think muslims are evil. You use history as if your a teacher of the world lol Your nothing but a scared soul . You bleed your thoughts and views as if were here aweighting your every word . LOL your nothing but a fire stater and the people of the wolrd are the water that put out your flame. Dang man the world is a amazing place , look around and be happy. Fucking asshole

laplateau

6:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Okay Airdlog, let's just agree that I am misreading you. In regard to the new city hall, I could not agree with you more about being a boondoggle. O'Reilly claims we have to get rid of the old city hall because there are just too many structural problems. That may be, but if that could be minutely true, it on y goes to show that he has not taken care f the place over the years. Do you remember when O'Reilly said that we were in dire straits in regard to our cash situation? We had to amend our charter to aloow him to raise the millage rates? That was in November, 2011. Now, less than a year after that, he says we need to buy a vacant building for our new city hall. The obvious question here is, what was the need to raise our millage rates to bail out of financial woes, but in less that a years, we can afford a new building? And, is the city going not going to do what they require any time a residence is sold...i.e., fix all the building and code violations before the place can be sold and the new owner (Art Space) moves in with a certificate of occupancy. place can be sold and the new owner moves with a certificate of occupancy. My guess is no. O'Reilly is a fraud and a liar. He has to go. Tom Tafelski...where are you?

Reply

laplateau

6:46 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

AC....maybe you should take the time to read what I wrote..which was "I don't know anyone that I associate with that would equal Muslims to terrorists. However, we do have to admit that almost all the terrorist acts that have been committed in the last 10 years have been done by those who have openly decried that they have done so in the name of Islam. So, some of the more narrow mined folks among us do get that impression without knowing a single person that claims to be a Muslim. ." Now AC, please read slowly so you can comprehend the words. Perhaps you can point your finger on the words as you read so you don 't miss anything. Do you see ANYthing there that I said about ALL Muslims being terrorists? The second sentence only says that most all terrorist acts in the last 10 years have been committed by those that espouse Islam. That cannot be denied. I follow that by saying only the narrow minded among us would think that all Muslims are terrorists. You give yourself away with “Zionist” comment, you pathetic Jew hater. Do you get it this time AC? Well, probably not, but only because your mind is clouded by your hatred and narrow minded discrimination and you read and disseminates things with that cloud overhead regardless of what the words say and mean.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AC

1:09 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

"Jew hater?" Surely you can do better than that. In fact, I hold all religions in equal contempt. You are conflating Judaism with Zionism. They are mutually exclusive. Educate yourself.

Comment_arrow

Freedom Of Others Thoughts

2:13 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

AC your a Joke . WTF man really Your so behind the times . Here let me say this your a asshole, People like you are the reason people think muslims are evil. You use history as if your a teacher of the world lol Your nothing but a scared soul . You bleed your thoughts and views as if were here aweighting your every word . LOL your nothing but a fire stater and the people of the wolrd are the water that put out your flame. Dang man the world is a amazing place , look around and be happy. Fucking asshole

Wondering

8:50 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

"Why can't this same tolerance be afforded to the Arabic Festival?"

Your reasoning might be sound if Michigan Avenue or Telegraph were closed down for 3 days for Homecoming, OR if Homecoming were only meant to celebrate one ethnicity....but neither are true. Why can't there be an "Arab" tent at Homecoming instead of a 3-day carnival in the middle of the street? Are you about "coming together" or "staying separate"? You're also wrong about streets being closed down for Homecoming. I live off of Cherry Hill and while parking is restricted, as it is for Arab Fest, I don't know of any streets that are closed to traffic, much less a major street like Warren Avenue.

Reply

laplateau

11:11 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

Dear Wondering.....My Lord…do you people NOT read what I said? Do you pick and choose just some of the words? Or, is your reading comprehension just that bad? I said that no other event in the city of Dearborn shuts down Michigan Ave, Warren, or any other street for 3 days. Homecoming is not meant to celebrate ANY ethnicity! It is what the name implies…a homecoming of al current residents and past residents. But, anyone can have a tent there, whether it be Arab, Polish, Italian, or any other. Many of the ethnic clubs do have a tent their for fundraising purposes mainly. It is open to all. You seem to be arguing the same point as I am…you say “Why can't there be an "Arab" tent at Homecoming instead of a 3-day carnival in the middle of the street? My point exactly…how could you miss that? I don‘t believe the festival should be blocking any street for 3 days. And where d you get that I said anything about streets being blocked off for Homecoming? I said, very clearly, that streets ARE NOT blocked off for any other multiple days event. So please, in the future, reads what people say. I am not presenting some sort of technical thesis here with very technical jargon. Read, comprehend, and then reply!

Reply

laplateau

11:18 am on Friday, February 8, 2013

My Lord…do you people NOT read what I said? Do you pick and choose just some of the words? Or, is your reading comprehension just that bad? I said that no other event in the city of Dearborn shuts down Michigan Ave, Warren, or any other street for 3 days. Homecoming is not meant to celebrate ANY ethnicity! It is what the name implies…a homecoming of al current residents and past residents. But, anyone can have a tent there, whether it be Arab, Polish, Italian, or any other. Many of the ethnic clubs do have a tent their for fundraising purposes mainly. It is open to all. You seem to be arguing the same point as I am…you say “Why can't there be an "Arab" tent at Homecoming instead of a 3-day carnival in the middle of the street? My point exactly…how could you miss that? I don‘t believe the festival should be blocking any street for 3 days. And where d you get that I said anything about streets being blocked off for Homecoming? I said, very clearly, that streets ARE NOT blocked off for any other multiple days event. So please, in the future, reads what people say. I am not presenting some sort of technical thesis here with very technical jargon. Read, comprehend, and then reply!

Reply

Wondering

7:45 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

"Dear Wondering.....My Lord…do you people NOT read what I said?"

Actually "this people" typically doesn't read more than the first line or so of your posts before moving on. If you weren't so full of yourself, you would have seen the little quoty thingies and realized I was quoting AC. I didn't even read your posts on this subject.

Reading comprehension, indeed.

Reply

laplateau

6:25 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

AC....Zionism...definition: "The national movement for the return of the Jewish people to their homeland and the resumption of Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel. Has come to include the development of the State of Israel and the protection of the Jewish nation in Israel." Your Zionist comment can mean nothing but your disdain for the Jewish people. And, define terrorism? Ok...how about what happened on 9/11? How about what happened at Fort Hood? What about what happened in Bengahzi? What about the beheading of Daniel Pearl? What about 26 February 1993 – World Trade Center bombing, in New York City. 6 killed. India 13 March 1993 – 1993 Bombay bombings. Mumbai, India. 257 dead, 713 injured.
Israel 6 April 1994 – Afula Bus suicide bombing, Afula. 8 deadIsrael 13 April 1994 – Hadera bus station suicide bombing, Hadera. 5 dead. Israel 19 October 1994 – Dizengoff Street bus bombing, Tel Aviv. 22 dead. Algeria 24 December 1994 – Air France Flight 8969 hijacking in Algiers by 3 members of Armed Islamic Group of Algeria and another terrorist. 7 killed including 4 hijackers. Israel 24 July 1995 – Ramat Gan bus 20 bombing, Ramat Gan. 6 dead. Add to this the ad infinitum list of those teens and preteens that have blown up countless innocents with bombs strapped to the chest? Need more..I can go on and on.Do you really need more of a lesson on what terrorism is...or Zionism? Please, educate yourself!

Reply
Comment_arrow

AC

8:10 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

You can scour the web for all the statistics ever kept. The numbers do not even come close to the murder rate of the biggest purveyor of violence and terror in the history of the world- the government of the United States of America.

laplateau

8:42 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

AC...Yes, spoken like what appears to be the true extreme Islamist and anti-everything American person you must be. You can't dispute the facts and figures in your weak and pathetic response, so yes, as it was so predictable that you would do, you spew some undue and untrue hatred and against the very government that has given you freedom and protection each and every day. You should be ashamed, but the REAL SHAME IS THAT YOU ARE NOT.

Reply

Leave a comment